» Articles » PMID: 36834246

Acute Responses to High-Intensity Back Squats with Bilateral Blood Flow Restriction

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2023 Feb 25
PMID 36834246
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study examined the acute effects of high-intensity resistance exercise with blood flow restriction (BFR) on performance and fatigue, metabolic stress, and markers of inflammation (interleukin-6 (IL-6)), muscle damage (myoglobin), angiogenesis (vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)). Thirteen resistance-trained participants (four female, 24.8 ± 4.7 years) performed four sets of barbell back-squats (75% 1RM) to failure under two conditions: blood flow restriction (BFR, bilateral 80% occlusion pressure) and control (CTRL). Completed repetitions and pre-post-exercise changes in maximal voluntary isometric contractions, countermovement jump, barbell mean propulsive velocity, and surface electromyography were recorded. Pre-post blood lactate (BLa) and venous blood samples for analysis of IL-6, myoglobin, and VEGF were collected. Ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and pain were recorded for each set. Fewer repetitions were performed during BFR (25.5 ± 9.6 reps) compared to CTRL (43.4 ± 14.2 reps, < 0.001), with greater repetitions performed during sets 1, 2, and 4 ( < 0.05) in CTRL. Although RPE between conditions was similar across all sets ( > 0.05), pain was greater in BFR across all sets ( < 0.05). Post-exercise fatigue was comparable between conditions. BLa was significantly greater in CTRL compared to BFR at two minutes ( = 0.001) but not four minutes post-exercise ( = 0.063). IL-6 was significantly elevated following BFR ( = 0.011). Comparable increases in myoglobin ( > 0.05) and no changes in VEGF were observed ( > 0.05). BFR increases the rate of muscular fatigue during high-intensity resistance exercise and acutely enhances IL-6 response, with significantly less total work performed, but increases pain perception, limiting implementation.

Citing Articles

Acute Responses of Low-Load Resistance Exercise with Blood Flow Restriction.

Jagim A, Schuler J, Szymanski E, Khurelbaatar C, Carpenter M, Fields J J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024; 9(4).

PMID: 39728238 PMC: 11678019. DOI: 10.3390/jfmk9040254.


The Effect of Blood Flow Restriction during Low-Load Resistance Training Unit on Knee Flexor Muscle Fatigue in Recreational Athletes: A Randomized Double-Blinded Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study.

Krolikowska A, Daszkiewicz M, Kocel J, Avram G, Oleksy L, Prill R J Clin Med. 2024; 13(18).

PMID: 39336929 PMC: 11432244. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13185444.

References
1.
Laurent C, Green J, Bishop P, Sjokvist J, Schumacker R, Richardson M . A practical approach to monitoring recovery: development of a perceived recovery status scale. J Strength Cond Res. 2010; 25(3):620-8. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181c69ec6. View

2.
Pedersen B, Steensberg A, Fischer C, Keller C, Ostrowski K, Schjerling P . Exercise and cytokines with particular focus on muscle-derived IL-6. Exerc Immunol Rev. 2001; 7:18-31. View

3.
Loenneke J, Kim D, Mouser J, Allen K, Thiebaud R, Abe T . Are there perceptual differences to varying levels of blood flow restriction?. Physiol Behav. 2016; 157:277-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.02.022. View

4.
Vechin F, Libardi C, Conceicao M, Damas F, Lixandrao M, Berton R . Comparisons between low-intensity resistance training with blood flow restriction and high-intensity resistance training on quadriceps muscle mass and strength in elderly. J Strength Cond Res. 2014; 29(4):1071-6. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000703. View

5.
Lowery R, Joy J, Loenneke J, De Souza E, Machado M, Dudeck J . Practical blood flow restriction training increases muscle hypertrophy during a periodized resistance training programme. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2013; 34(4):317-21. DOI: 10.1111/cpf.12099. View