» Articles » PMID: 36833815

Inertial Sensor Location for Ground Reaction Force and Gait Event Detection Using Reservoir Computing in Gait

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2023 Feb 25
PMID 36833815
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Inertial measurement units (IMUs) have shown promising outcomes for estimating gait event detection (GED) and ground reaction force (GRF). This study aims to determine the best sensor location for GED and GRF prediction in gait using data from IMUs for healthy and medial knee osteoarthritis (MKOA) individuals. In this study, 27 healthy and 18 MKOA individuals participated. Participants walked at different speeds on an instrumented treadmill. Five synchronized IMUs (Physilog, 200 Hz) were placed on the lower limb (top of the shoe, heel, above medial malleolus, middle and front of tibia, and on medial of shank close to knee joint). To predict GRF and GED, an artificial neural network known as reservoir computing was trained using combinations of acceleration signals retrieved from each IMU. For GRF prediction, the best sensor location was top of the shoe for 72.2% and 41.7% of individuals in the healthy and MKOA populations, respectively, based on the minimum value of the mean absolute error (MAE). For GED, the minimum MAE value for both groups was for middle and front of tibia, then top of the shoe. This study demonstrates that top of the shoe is the best sensor location for GED and GRF prediction.

Citing Articles

Estimation of Kinetics Using IMUs to Monitor and Aid in Clinical Decision-Making during ACL Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review.

Krishnakumar S, van Beijnum B, Baten C, Veltink P, Buurke J Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(7).

PMID: 38610374 PMC: 11014074. DOI: 10.3390/s24072163.

References
1.
Mundermann A, Dyrby C, Andriacchi T . Secondary gait changes in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: increased load at the ankle, knee, and hip during walking. Arthritis Rheum. 2005; 52(9):2835-44. DOI: 10.1002/art.21262. View

2.
Horsley B, Tofari P, Halson S, Kemp J, Dickson J, Maniar N . Does Site Matter? Impact of Inertial Measurement Unit Placement on the Validity and Reliability of Stride Variables During Running: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2021; 51(7):1449-1489. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-021-01443-8. View

3.
Holzreiter S, Kohle M . Assessment of gait patterns using neural networks. J Biomech. 1993; 26(6):645-51. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(93)90028-d. View

4.
Najafi B, Khan T, Wrobel J . Laboratory in a box: wearable sensors and its advantages for gait analysis. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012; 2011:6507-10. DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091605. View

5.
Jacobs D, Ferris D . Estimation of ground reaction forces and ankle moment with multiple, low-cost sensors. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015; 12:90. PMC: 4606964. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-015-0081-x. View