» Articles » PMID: 36831928

Improved Tool for Predicting Skin Irritation on Reconstructed Human Epidermis Models Based on Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy

Overview
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2023 Feb 25
PMID 36831928
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The rabbit skin irritation test has been the standard for evaluating the irritation potential of chemicals; however, alternative methods that do not use animal testing are actively encouraged. Reconstructed human epidermis (RhE) models mimic the biochemical and physiological properties of the human epidermis and can be used as an alternative method. On RhE methods, the metabolic activity of RhE models is used to predict skin irritation, with a reduction in metabolic activity indicating a reduced number of viable cells and linking cell death to skin irritation processes. However, new challenges have emerged as the use of RhE models increases, including the need for non-invasive and marker-free methodologies to assess cellular states. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) is one such methodology that can meet these requirements. In this study, our results showed that EIS can differentiate between irritant and non-irritant chemicals, with a significant increase in the capacitance values observed in the irritant samples. A ROC curve analysis showed that the prediction method based on EIS met OECD TG 439 requirements at all time points and had 95% within-laboratory reproducibility. Comparison with the MTT viability assay showed that prediction using EIS achieved higher sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. These results suggest that EIS could potentially replace animal testing in the evaluation of irritation potential and could be a valuable addition to in vitro testing strategies.

References
1.
Eddy N, Momoh-Yahaya H, Oguzie E . Theoretical and experimental studies on the corrosion inhibition potentials of some purines for aluminum in 0.1 M HCl. J Adv Res. 2015; 6(2):203-17. PMC: 4348476. DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2014.01.004. View

2.
Sjovall P, Skedung L, Gregoire S, Biganska O, Clement F, Luengo G . Imaging the distribution of skin lipids and topically applied compounds in human skin using mass spectrometry. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):16683. PMC: 6232133. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-34286-x. View

3.
Cotovio J, Grandidier M, Portes P, Roguet R, Rubinstenn G . The in vitro skin irritation of chemicals: optimisation of the EPISKIN prediction model within the framework of the ECVAM validation process. Altern Lab Anim. 2005; 33(4):329-49. DOI: 10.1177/026119290503300403. View

4.
Knox S, OBoyle N . Skin lipids in health and disease: A review. Chem Phys Lipids. 2021; 236:105055. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2021.105055. View

5.
Lee R, Choi H, Shin J, Kim K, Yoo K . Distinguishing between apoptosis and necrosis using a capacitance sensor. Biosens Bioelectron. 2009; 24(8):2586-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2009.01.028. View