» Articles » PMID: 36829452

Systematics of Ditaxinae and Related Lineages Within the Subfamily Acalyphoideae (Euphorbiaceae) Based on Molecular Phylogenetics

Overview
Journal Biology (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biology
Date 2023 Feb 25
PMID 36829452
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The subtribe Ditaxinae in the plant family Euphorbiaceae is composed of five genera (, , , and ) and approximately 120 species of perennial herbs (rarely annual) to treelets. The subtribe is distributed throughout the Americas, with the exception of , which also occurs in tropical Africa and Madagascar. Under the current classification, Ditaxinae includes genera with a questionable morphology-based taxonomy, especially , and . Moreover, phylogenetic relationships among genera are largely unexplored, with previous works sampling <10% of taxa, showing Ditaxinae as paraphyletic. In this study, we inferred the phylogenetic relationships within Ditaxinae and related taxa using a dataset of nuclear (ETS, ITS) and plastid (D, LF, TL) DNA sequences and a wide taxon sampling (60%). We confirmed the paraphyly of Ditaxinae and , both with high support. Following our phylogenetic results, we combined in and upgraded Ditaxinae to the tribe level (Ditaxeae). We also established and described the tribe Caperonieae based on , and transferred to the tribe Adelieae, along with , , and . Finally, we discuss the main morphological synapomorphies for the genera and tribes and provide a taxonomic treatment, including all species recognized under each genus.

Citing Articles

The chloroplast genome of Chrozophora sabulosa Kar. & Kir. and its exploration in the evolutionary position uncertainty of genus Chrozophora.

Javaid N, Ramzan M, Jabeen S, Du Y, Anwar M, Xiqiang S BMC Genomics. 2024; 25(1):597.

PMID: 38877411 PMC: 11177538. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-024-10366-3.


Advances in Plant Taxonomy and Systematics.

Peruzzi L Biology (Basel). 2023; 12(4).

PMID: 37106770 PMC: 10135926. DOI: 10.3390/biology12040570.

References
1.
Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J . A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML Web servers. Syst Biol. 2008; 57(5):758-71. DOI: 10.1080/10635150802429642. View

2.
Ronquist F, Deans A . Bayesian phylogenetics and its influence on insect systematics. Annu Rev Entomol. 2009; 55:189-206. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ento.54.110807.090529. View

3.
Okonechnikov K, Golosova O, Fursov M . Unipro UGENE: a unified bioinformatics toolkit. Bioinformatics. 2012; 28(8):1166-7. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts091. View

4.
Alfaro M, Zoller S, Lutzoni F . Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence. Mol Biol Evol. 2003; 20(2):255-66. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msg028. View

5.
Wurdack K, Hoffmann P, Chase M . Molecular phylogenetic analysis of uniovulate Euphorbiaceae (Euphorbiaceae sensu stricto) using plastid RBCL and TRNL-F DNA sequences. Am J Bot. 2011; 92(8):1397-420. DOI: 10.3732/ajb.92.8.1397. View