» Articles » PMID: 36826164

Increasing Risk of Tick-Borne Disease Through Growth Stages in Ticks

Overview
Journal Clin Pract
Publisher MDPI
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2023 Feb 24
PMID 36826164
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

and spp. are pathogens transmitted by ticks to humans. However, the developmental stage of the tick carrying the greatest risk of infection is unknown. Detection of pathogen-specific genes proves that ticks carrying or spp. constitute a reservoir of infection. However, conventional PCR methods are unable to quantitate the pathogens within ticks. In the present study, we collected ticks in the endemic area of Japanese spotted fever, caused by , and determined the rate of tick-borne pathogens carried by the ticks. As a method of evaluation, next-generation sequencing was used to estimate the proportion of pathogens in 10 adult and 10 larval ticks. Ticks were identified (H.L) from the results of the sequencing of PCR products amplified using tick identification-specific primers. The gene detection rates were 10/10 for sp. and 10/10 for sp. among the adult ticks. For the larval ticks, the ratios were 7/10 and 5/10 for sp. and sp., respectively. The largest proportion of sp.-specific DNA reached 96% in one adult tick. The proportion of sp. genes ranged from 1.76% to 41.81% (mean, 15.56%) in the adult ticks. The proportions of and spp. genes in the larvae ranged from 0% to 27.4% (mean 5.86%) and from 0% to 14.6% (mean 3.38%), respectively. When the percentage of sp., out of all pathogens detected via next-generation sequencing, was analyzed between the adult and larval stages of the ticks, a significant difference was observed at = 0.0254. For sp., a highly significant difference ( < 0.0001) was found between the adult and larval stages of the ticks. In conclusion, the detection rates and proportions of and spp. genes were highest in adult H.L ticks. The risk of contracting tick-borne infections may increase with bites from adult ticks, especially those harboring sp.

References
1.
Graves S, Gerrard J, Coghill S . Q fever following a tick bite. Aust J Gen Pract. 2020; 49(12):823-825. DOI: 10.31128/AJGP-01-20-5195. View

2.
Morshed M, Lee M, Boyd E, Mak S, Fraser E, Nguyen J . Passive Tick Surveillance and Detection of Species in Ticks from British Columbia, Canada: 2002-2018. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2021; 21(7):490-497. DOI: 10.1089/vbz.2020.2743. View

3.
Krishnamoorthy P, Sudhagar S, Goudar A, Jacob S, Suresh K . Molecular survey and phylogenetic analysis of tick-borne pathogens in ticks infesting cattle from two South Indian states. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports. 2021; 25:100595. DOI: 10.1016/j.vprsr.2021.100595. View

4.
Kondo M, Matsushima Y, Nakanishi T, Iida S, Habe K, Yamanaka K . A novel transmission of Aeromonas hydrophila via tick bites. J Dermatol. 2022; 49(7):e243-e245. DOI: 10.1111/1346-8138.16371. View

5.
Thu M, Qiu Y, Matsuno K, Kajihara M, Mori-Kajihara A, Omori R . Diversity of spotted fever group rickettsiae and their association with host ticks in Japan. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):1500. PMC: 6365641. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-37836-5. View