» Articles » PMID: 36824373

Design Considerations of Benchtop Fluid Flow Bioreactors for Bio-engineered Tissue Equivalents

Overview
Date 2023 Feb 24
PMID 36824373
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

One of the major aims of bio-engineering tissue equivalents is to create physiologically relevant culture conditions to accurately recreate the cellular microenvironment. This often includes incorporation of factors such as the extracellular matrix, co-culture of multiple cell types and three-dimensional culture techniques. These advanced techniques can recapitulate some of the properties of tissue , however fluid flow is a key aspect that is often absent. Fluid flow can be introduced into cell and tissue culture using bioreactors, which are becoming increasingly common as we seek to produce increasingly accurate tissue models. Bespoke technology is continuously being developed to tailor systems for specific applications and to allow compatibility with a range of culture techniques. For effective perfusion of a tissue culture many parameters can be controlled, ranging from impacts of the fluid flow such as increased shear stress and mass transport, to potentially unwanted side effects such as temperature fluctuations. A thorough understanding of these properties and their implications on the culture model can aid with a more accurate interpretation of results. Improved and more complete characterisation of bioreactor properties will also lead to greater accuracy when reporting culture conditions in protocols, aiding experimental reproducibility, and allowing more precise comparison of results between different systems. In this review we provide an analysis of the different factors involved in the development of benchtop flow bioreactors and their potential biological impacts across a range of applications.

Citing Articles

Comparative assessment of macrophage responses and antileishmanial efficacy in dynamic vs. Static culture systems utilizing chitosan-based formulations.

Riezk A, OKeeffe A, Van Bocxlaer K, Yardley V, Croft S PLoS One. 2025; 20(3):e0319610.

PMID: 40067861 PMC: 11896045. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319610.


Complex in vitro models: do not complicate it.

Oliveira J In Vitro Model. 2025; 2(3-4):67-68.

PMID: 39871997 PMC: 11756430. DOI: 10.1007/s44164-023-00060-1.


Engineering interfacial tissues: The myotendinous junction.

Snow F, OConnell C, Yang P, Kita M, Pirogova E, Williams R APL Bioeng. 2024; 8(2):021505.

PMID: 38841690 PMC: 11151436. DOI: 10.1063/5.0189221.


Cultivation of Bovine Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Plant-Based Scaffolds in a Macrofluidic Single-Use Bioreactor for Cultured Meat.

Gome G, Chak B, Tawil S, Shpatz D, Giron J, Brajzblat I Foods. 2024; 13(9).

PMID: 38731732 PMC: 11083346. DOI: 10.3390/foods13091361.


Computer-aided engineering and additive manufacturing for bioreactors in tissue engineering: State of the art and perspectives.

Di Gravina G, Loi G, Auricchio F, Conti M Biophys Rev (Melville). 2024; 4(3):031303.

PMID: 38510707 PMC: 10903388. DOI: 10.1063/5.0156704.


References
1.
Burova I, Wall I, Shipley R . Mathematical and computational models for bone tissue engineering in bioreactor systems. J Tissue Eng. 2019; 10:2041731419827922. PMC: 6391543. DOI: 10.1177/2041731419827922. View

2.
Wilkening S, Stahl F, Bader A . Comparison of primary human hepatocytes and hepatoma cell line Hepg2 with regard to their biotransformation properties. Drug Metab Dispos. 2003; 31(8):1035-42. DOI: 10.1124/dmd.31.8.1035. View

3.
Poisson J, Lemoinne S, Boulanger C, Durand F, Moreau R, Valla D . Liver sinusoidal endothelial cells: Physiology and role in liver diseases. J Hepatol. 2016; 66(1):212-227. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.07.009. View

4.
Vande Voorde J, Ackermann T, Pfetzer N, Sumpton D, Mackay G, Kalna G . Improving the metabolic fidelity of cancer models with a physiological cell culture medium. Sci Adv. 2019; 5(1):eaau7314. PMC: 6314821. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aau7314. View

5.
Stavenschi E, Labour M, Hoey D . Oscillatory fluid flow induces the osteogenic lineage commitment of mesenchymal stem cells: The effect of shear stress magnitude, frequency, and duration. J Biomech. 2017; 55:99-106. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.02.002. View