» Articles » PMID: 36823614

Interactive Training Versus Self-driven Training in the Prediction of Colorectal Polyp Histology by Trainees Using the NICE Classification

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2023 Feb 24
PMID 36823614
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted endoscopic training of the Narrow Band Imaging International Colorectal Endoscopic (NICE) classification, which could accurately predict pathology of colorectal polyps. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance by trainees of self-driven training vs. interactive training in the prediction of colorectal polyp histology.

Methods: This was a prospective randomized controlled study at five academic centers from January 1, 2021 to May 31, 2021. Trainees with no previous formal training of narrow band imaging or blue light imaging for prediction of colorectal polyp histology were randomly allocated to the self-driven training group or interactive training group. Before and after the training, all trainees were given 20 selected cases of colorectal polyp for testing. Their diagnostic performance was analyzed.

Results: Overall, the two training groups showed similar accuracy of NICE classification (79.3% vs. 78.1%; P = 0.637), vessel analysis (77.8% vs. 77.6%, P = 0.939), and surface pattern analysis (78.1% vs. 76.9%, P = 0.616). The accuracy of color analysis in the interactive training group was better (74.4% vs. 80.0%, P = 0.027). For high-confidence predictions, the self-driven training group showed higher accuracy of NICE classification (84.8% vs. 78.7%, P < 0.001) but no difference for analysis of color (79.6% vs. 81.0%), vessel pattern (83.0% vs. 78.5%), and surface pattern (81.8% vs. 78.5%).

Conclusions: Overall, self-driven training showed comparable accuracy of NICE classification, vessel pattern, and surface pattern to interactive training, but lower accuracy of color analysis. This method showed comparable effectiveness and is more applicable than interactive training. It is worth spreading during the COVID-19 pandemic. Trial registration Name of the registry: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, Trial registration number: ChiCTR2000031659, Date of registration: 06/04/2020, URL of trial registry record: http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=51994.

Citing Articles

Advances and challenges in endoscopy training: A mixed methods study among endoscopy trainers in the Netherlands.

Mousset R, Diemers A, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel W, Pierie J, Langers A, Brand P Endosc Int Open. 2024; 12(9):E1006-E1014.

PMID: 39588471 PMC: 11586648. DOI: 10.1055/a-2370-5812.

References
1.
Hewett D, Kaltenbach T, Sano Y, Tanaka S, Saunders B, Ponchon T . Validation of a simple classification system for endoscopic diagnosis of small colorectal polyps using narrow-band imaging. Gastroenterology. 2012; 143(3):599-607.e1. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.05.006. View

2.
Mallon D, Pohl J, Phatak U, Fernandes M, Rosen J, Lusman S . Impact of COVID-19 on Pediatric Gastroenterology Fellow Training in North America. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2020; 71(1):6-11. PMC: 7273936. DOI: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002768. View

3.
Jafar W . COVID-19 and endoscopy training. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2020; 11(5):413-414. PMC: 7447273. DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2020-101573. View

4.
Bhandari P, Subramaniam S, Bourke M, Alkandari A, Chiu P, Brown J . Recovery of endoscopy services in the era of COVID-19: recommendations from an international Delphi consensus. Gut. 2020; 69(11):1915-1924. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322329. View

5.
Pawlak K, Kral J, Khan R, Amin S, Bilal M, Lui R . Impact of COVID-19 on endoscopy trainees: an international survey. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020; 92(4):925-935. PMC: 7287420. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.06.010. View