» Articles » PMID: 36819938

Tinnitus and Distress: an Electroencephalography Classification Study

Overview
Journal Brain Commun
Specialty Neurology
Date 2023 Feb 23
PMID 36819938
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There exist no objective markers for tinnitus or tinnitus disorders, which complicates diagnosis and treatments. The combination of EEG with sophisticated classification procedures may reveal biomarkers that can identify tinnitus and accurately differentiate different levels of distress experienced by patients. EEG recordings were obtained from 129 tinnitus patients and 142 healthy controls. Linear support vector machines were used to develop two classifiers: the first differentiated tinnitus patients from controls, while the second differentiated tinnitus patients with low and high distress levels. The classifier for healthy controls and tinnitus patients performed with an average accuracy of 96 and 94% for the training and test sets, respectively. For the distress classifier, these average accuracies were 89 and 84%. Minimal overlap was observed between the features of the two classifiers. EEG-derived features made it possible to accurately differentiate healthy controls and tinnitus patients as well as low and high distress tinnitus patients. The minimal overlap between the features of the two classifiers indicates that the source of distress in tinnitus, which could also be involved in distress related to other conditions, stems from different neuronal mechanisms compared to those causing the tinnitus pathology itself.

Citing Articles

A scoping review of tinnitus research undertaken by New Zealand researchers: Aotearoa-an international hotspot for tinnitus innovation and collaboration.

Searchfield G, Adhia D, Barde A, Ridder D, Doborjeh M, Doborjeh Z J R Soc N Z. 2025; 55(3):466-500.

PMID: 39989649 PMC: 11841108. DOI: 10.1080/03036758.2024.2363424.


Personalized Sound Therapy Combined with Low and High-Frequency Electromagnetic Stimulation for Chronic Tinnitus.

Francavilla B, Marzocchella G, Alagna A, Tilotta S, Di Leo E, Omer G J Pers Med. 2024; 14(9).

PMID: 39338167 PMC: 11432753. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14090912.


EEG signals from tinnitus sufferers at identifying their sound tinnitus.

Torres-Torres A, Alonso-Valerdi L, Ibarra-Zarate D, Gonzalez-Sanchez A Data Brief. 2024; 53:110142.

PMID: 38357451 PMC: 10864829. DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2024.110142.


Review and Perspective on Brain Bases of Tinnitus.

Husain F, Khan R J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2023; 24(6):549-562.

PMID: 37919556 PMC: 10752862. DOI: 10.1007/s10162-023-00914-1.

References
1.
Gemein L, Schirrmeister R, Chrabaszcz P, Wilson D, Boedecker J, Schulze-Bonhage A . Machine-learning-based diagnostics of EEG pathology. Neuroimage. 2020; 220:117021. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117021. View

2.
Mateos D, Guevara Erra R, Wennberg R, Perez Velazquez J . Measures of entropy and complexity in altered states of consciousness. Cogn Neurodyn. 2018; 12(1):73-84. PMC: 5801282. DOI: 10.1007/s11571-017-9459-8. View

3.
Thomas J, Comoretto L, Jin J, Dauwels J, Cash S, Westover M . EEG CLassification Via Convolutional Neural Network-Based Interictal Epileptiform Event Detection. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2018; 2018:3148-3151. PMC: 6775768. DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2018.8512930. View

4.
Hesser H, Weise C, Zetterqvist Westin V, Andersson G . A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of cognitive-behavioral therapy for tinnitus distress. Clin Psychol Rev. 2011; 31(4):545-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.12.006. View

5.
Bhatt J, Lin H, Bhattacharyya N . Prevalence, Severity, Exposures, and Treatment Patterns of Tinnitus in the United States. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016; 142(10):959-965. PMC: 5812683. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.1700. View