» Articles » PMID: 36819468

Clinical Outcomes of Patients Treated with Template-based High-dose-rate Interstitial Brachytherapy Boost for Post-operative Recurrent Gynecological Malignancies: A Retrospective Analysis

Abstract

Purpose: To report the clinical outcomes in patients treated with Martinez universal perineal interstitial template (MUPIT)-based interstitial brachytherapy boost for primary and recurrent vault and vaginal cancers, and to perform a comparative analysis with our previously published series of similar patients.

Material And Methods: One hundred and seventeen patients treated between January, 2009 and December, 2015 were evaluated. Descriptive statistics for the patterns of relapse, local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and late toxicities were carried out. Kaplan-Meier curves were used for survival analysis. All variables with the potential to affect outcomes were tested using log-rank test for statistical significance.

Results: At a median follow-up of 63 months, LRFS, DFS, and OS at 3/5 years were 77.1%/74.7%, 61%/52%, and 72.3%/63.1%, respectively. Overall treatment time (OTT) of 56 days did not affect outcomes. Bulky tumors and OTT > 63 days adversely affected LRFS. Overall treatment time also significantly impacted DFS and OS. Grade 3-4 late bladder toxicities were observed in 1.7% patients, and grade 3-4 late rectal toxicities in 5% patients. Compared to our previous series, the outcome in the current series is better in terms of severe late toxicities (5% improvement in rectal toxicity, and 2.7% improvement in bladder toxicity) and OS by 10%. This could be attributed to the increasing use of concurrent chemotherapy and relative optimization strategies for organs at risk.

Conclusions: Patients with primary and recurrent vault and vaginal cancers treated with high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy boost using MUPIT resulted in modest clinical outcomes and acceptable late toxicities. OTT was the most important factor affecting the outcomes.

Citing Articles

Impact of MRI-based planning in transperineal interstitial brachytherapy for vaginal-involving tumors.

Guevara Barrera D, Rodriguez Villalba S, Suso-Marti L, Sanchis-Sanchez E, Perez-Calatayud J, Blazquez Molina F J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2024; 16(5):335-343.

PMID: 39719955 PMC: 11664797. DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2024.144683.


Contribution of Tata Memorial Centre, India, to cervical cancer care: Journey of two decades.

Kumar A, Chopra S, Gupta S Indian J Med Res. 2022; 154(2):319-328.

PMID: 35295006 PMC: 9131759. DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_339_21.

References
1.
Corn B, Lanciano R, Rosenblum N, Schnall M, King S, Epperson R . Improved treatment planning for the Syed-Neblett template using endorectal-coil magnetic resonance and intraoperative (laparotomy/laparoscopy) guidance: a new integrated technique for hysterectomized women with vaginal tumors. Gynecol Oncol. 1995; 56(2):255-61. DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1995.1042. View

2.
Marar M, Simiele E, Niedermayr T, Kidd E . Applying 3D-Printed Templates in High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Cervix Cancer: Simplified Needle Insertion for Optimized Dosimetry. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2022; 114(1):111-119. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.05.027. View

3.
Chopra S, Engineer R, Shah S, Shukla R, Dora T, Gupta P . MRI- and PET-Guided Interstitial Brachytherapy for Postsurgical Vaginal Recurrences of Cervical Cancer: Results of Phase II Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019; 106(2):310-319. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.10.037. View

4.
Mahantshetty U, Gudi S, Singh R, Sasidharan A, Sastri S, Gurram L . Indian Brachytherapy Society Guidelines for radiotherapeutic management of cervical cancer with special emphasis on high-dose-rate brachytherapy. J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2019; 11(4):293-306. PMC: 6737572. DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2019.87406. View

5.
Banerjee R, Kamrava M . Brachytherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer: a review. Int J Womens Health. 2014; 6:555-64. PMC: 4045176. DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S46247. View