» Articles » PMID: 36818159

Perceptions of Ethicality: The Role of Attire Style, Attire Appropriateness, and Context

Overview
Journal J Bus Ethics
Specialty Medical Ethics
Date 2023 Feb 23
PMID 36818159
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Professional attire has traditionally been regarded as a sign of ethicality. However, recent trends towards a more casual workplace may have altered the general public's attire-based perceptions. To determine whether these trends have rendered the association between professional attire and ethicality obsolete, we draw on signaling theory and we examine, in two laboratory studies with working samples, the main effects of attire style (i.e., business formal, business casual, casual) on perceptions of employee ethicality. We also assess the mediating effects of attire appropriateness, the moderating effects of context (industry type), as well as their combined moderated-mediation effects in the relation between attire style and the outcome of interest. We find that casual attire is perceived as less ethical than business casual attire in both studies but is perceived as less ethical than business formal attire in the first study only. Moreover, the effect of attire style on perceptions of ethicality is mediated by perceptions of attire appropriateness. Lastly, we found inconclusive results for the moderated-mediation model, which suggest a more intricate effect of industry type than originally proposed. Three subsequent focus groups with working professionals provided additional insights into our findings and revealed workplace-relevant outcomes associated with perceptions of ethicality. Theoretical and practical implications, study limitations, and future research avenues are discussed.

References
1.
Ballew 2nd C, Todorov A . Predicting political elections from rapid and unreflective face judgments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(46):17948-53. PMC: 2084277. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0705435104. View

2.
McCrae R, Mottus R, Hrebickova M, Realo A, Allik J . Source method biases as implicit personality theory at the domain and facet levels. J Pers. 2018; 87(4):813-826. DOI: 10.1111/jopy.12435. View

3.
Esmail A, Poncet F, Auger C, Rochette A, Dahan-Oliel N, Labbe D . The role of clothing on participation of persons with a physical disability: A scoping review. Appl Ergon. 2020; 85:103058. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103058. View

4.
Nyamathi A, Shuler P . Focus group interview: a research technique for informed nursing practice. J Adv Nurs. 1990; 15(11):1281-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1990.tb01743.x. View

5.
Riva S, Chinyio E, Hampton P . Biased Perceptions and Personality Traits Attribution: Cognitive Aspects in Future Interventions for Organizations. Front Psychol. 2019; 9:2472. PMC: 6340921. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02472. View