» Articles » PMID: 36815957

Factors Associated with Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator Shocks in Patients Suffering from Non-ischemic Cardiomyopathy

Overview
Date 2023 Feb 23
PMID 36815957
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Although intra-cardiac shocks are a lifesaving approach in patients with systolic heart failure (HF), the probable effective factors related to shock occurrence are less frequently recognized. We designed this study to assess the factors associated with inappropriate or appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM).

Methods: Ninety-nine patients with NICM who implanted ICD were enrolled from March 2018 to September 2019 and followed up with a three-month interval for up to one year. Shock therapy was defined as either appropriate or inappropriate shock. The odds ratio (OR) of inappropriate shock occurrence was calculated with crude and different adjusted models.

Results: The mean age of the population at baseline was 51.9 ± 15.4 years (men: 71%). Baseline data revealed that patients with inappropriate shocks had higher heart rates (HR), worse New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, and anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) as well as higher percentages of amiodarone usage compared to groups with appropriate or no shock [HR: 96.8 ± 27.8 vs. 79.8 ± 12.1 vs. 76.2 ± 17.6 beats per minute (bpm), P = 0.014; NYHA class IV: 85.7% vs. 74.1% vs. 63.4%, P = 0.041; ATP: 37.5% vs. 29% vs. 5%, P = 0.010; amiodarone usage: 37.5% vs. 25.8% vs. 5%, P = 0.23, respectively]. Further multiple-adjusted OR did not reveal any significant independent association between the aforementioned variables and inappropriate shock incidence.

Conclusion: This study indicates no significant independent predisposing factor in the occurrence of inappropriate shocks among patients with NICM. Other studies are required in this regard.

References
1.
Moss A, Schuger C, Beck C, Brown M, Cannom D, Daubert J . Reduction in inappropriate therapy and mortality through ICD programming. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367(24):2275-83. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1211107. View

2.
MOSS A, Hall W, Cannom D, Daubert J, Higgins S, Klein H . Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1996; 335(26):1933-40. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199612263352601. View

3.
Ponikowski P, Voors A, Anker S, Bueno H, Cleland J, Coats A . 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Developed with the special.... Eur Heart J. 2016; 37(27):2129-2200. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128. View

4.
Steinbeck G, Dorwarth U, Mattke S, Hoffmann E, Markewitz A, Kaulbach H . Hemodynamic deterioration during ICD implant: predictors of high-risk patients. Am Heart J. 1994; 127(4 Pt 2):1064-7. DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(94)90088-4. View

5.
Sweeney M, Sherfesee L, DeGroot P, Wathen M, Wilkoff B . Differences in effects of electrical therapy type for ventricular arrhythmias on mortality in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients. Heart Rhythm. 2010; 7(3):353-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.11.027. View