» Articles » PMID: 36813904

Do MRI-derived Muscle Moment-arms in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain Differ from Healthy Individuals? A Comparative Study

Overview
Journal Eur Spine J
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2023 Feb 22
PMID 36813904
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The present study aimed to estimate the trunk muscles moment-arms in low back pain (LBP) patients and compare this data to those of healthy individuals. This research further explored whether the difference of the moment-arms between these two is a contributing factor to LBP.

Methodology: Fifty patients with CLBP (group A) and 25 healthy controls (group B) were enrolled. All participants were subjected to magnetic resonance imaging of lumbar spine. Muscle moment-arms were estimated on a T2W axial section parallel to the disc.

Results: There was statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in the sagittal plane moment-arms at L1-L2 for right erector spinae (ES), bilateral psoas and rectus abdominis (RA), right quadratus lumborum (QL), and left obliques; bilateral ES, QL, RA, and right psoas at L2-L3; bilateral QL, RA, and obliques at L3-L4; bilateral RA and obliques at L4-L5; and bilateral psoas, RA, and obliques at L5-S1. There was no statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) in the coronal plane moment-arms except for left ES and QL at L1-L2; left QL and right RA at L3-L4; right RA and obliques at L4-L5; and bilateral ES and right RA at L5-S1.

Conclusions: There was a significant difference in muscle moment-arms of the lumbar spine's prime stabilizer (psoas) and primary locomotors (rectus abdominis and obliques) between LBP patients and healthy individuals. This difference in the moment-arms leads to altered compressive forces at intervertebral discs and may be one of the risk factors for LBP.

References
1.
Cole M, Grimshaw P, Burden A . Loads on the lumbar spine during a work capacity assessment test. Work. 2004; 23(2):169-78. View

2.
Macintosh J, Bogduk N . 1987 Volvo award in basic science. The morphology of the lumbar erector spinae. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1987; 12(7):658-68. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198709000-00004. View

3.
McGill S, Juker D, Kropf P . Appropriately placed surface EMG electrodes reflect deep muscle activity (psoas, quadratus lumborum, abdominal wall) in the lumbar spine. J Biomech. 1996; 29(11):1503-7. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(96)84547-7. View

4.
Christophy M, Faruk Senan N, Lotz J, OReilly O . A musculoskeletal model for the lumbar spine. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2011; 11(1-2):19-34. DOI: 10.1007/s10237-011-0290-6. View

5.
Dumas G, Poulin M, Roy B, Gagnon M, Jovanovic M . A three-dimensional digitization method to measure trunk muscle lines of action. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988; 13(5):532-41. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198805000-00017. View