» Articles » PMID: 36813665

The Social and Socio-political Embeddedness of COVID-19 Vaccination Decision-making: A Five-country Qualitative Interview Study from Europe

Abstract

The uptake ofCOVID-19 vaccines has varied considerably across European countries. This study investigates people's decision-making process regarding vaccination by analyzing qualitative interviews (n = 214) with residents from five European countries: Austria, Germany, Italy, Portugal, and Switzerland. We identify three factors that shape vaccination decision-making: individual experiences and pre-existing attitudes towards vaccination, social environment, and socio-political context. Based on this analysis, we present a typology of decision-making regarding COVID-19 vaccines, where some types present stable stances towards vaccines and others change over time. Trust in government and relevant stakeholders, broader social factors, and people's direct social environment were particularly relevant to these dynamics. We conclude that vaccination campaigns should be considered long-term projects (also outside of pandemics) in need of regular adjustment, communication and fine-tuning to ensure public trust. This is particularly pertinent for booster vaccinations, such as COVID-19 or influenza.

Citing Articles

Reaching the unreached through building trust: a mixed-method study on COVID-19 vaccination in rural Lao PDR.

Phrasisombath K, Kubota S, Elliott E, Horiuchi S, Ounaphom P, Phimmachak L BMJ Glob Health. 2024; 9(6).

PMID: 38843896 PMC: 11163684. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014680.


Solidarity and reciprocity during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal qualitative interview study from Germany.

Schonweitz F, Zimmermann B, Hangel N, Fiske A, McLennan S, Sierawska A BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):23.

PMID: 38166737 PMC: 10763370. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-17521-7.

References
1.
Parsons Leigh J, Halperin D, Mizen S, FitzGerald E, Moss S, Fiest K . Exploring the impact of media and information on self-reported intentions to vaccinate against COVID-19: A qualitative interview-based study. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022; 18(5):2048623. PMC: 9196778. DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2048623. View

2.
Falkenbach M, Willison C . Resources or trust: What matters more in the vaccination strategies of high-income liberal democracies?. Health Policy Technol. 2022; 11(2):100618. PMC: 8956345. DOI: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2022.100618. View

3.
MacDonald N . Vaccine hesitancy: Definition, scope and determinants. Vaccine. 2015; 33(34):4161-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.036. View

4.
Paul K, Loer K . Contemporary vaccination policy in the European Union: tensions and dilemmas. J Public Health Policy. 2019; 40(2):166-179. DOI: 10.1057/s41271-019-00163-8. View

5.
Henkel L, Sprengholz P, Korn L, Betsch C, Bohm R . The association between vaccination status identification and societal polarization. Nat Hum Behav. 2022; 7(2):231-239. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-022-01469-6. View