Factors Influencing Successful Reconstruction of Tympanic Membrane Perforations: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: Based on a systematic review and meta-analysis, our study aimed to provide information about the factors that influence the success of tympanic membrane reconstruction.
Methods: Our systematic search was conducted on November 24, 2021, using the CENTRAL, Embase, and MEDLINE databases. Observational studies with a minimum of 12 months of follow-up on type I tympanoplasty or myringoplasty were included, while non-English articles, patients with cholesteatoma or specific inflammatory diseases, and ossiculoplasty cases were excluded. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42021289240) and PRISMA reporting guideline was used. Risk of bias was evaluated with the QUIPS tool. A random effect model was used in the analyses. Primary outcome was the rate of closed tympanic cavities.
Results: After duplicate removal, 9454 articles were found, of which 39 cohort studies were included. Results of four analyses showed significant effects: age (OR: 0.62, CI 0.50; 0.78, p value: 0.0002), size of the perforation (OR: 0.52, CI 0.29; 0.94, p value: 0.033), opposite ear condition (OR: 0.32, CI 0.12; 0.85, p value: 0.028), and the surgeon's experience (OR: 0.42, CI 0.26; 0.67, p value: 0.005), while prior adenoid surgery, smoking, the site of the perforation, and discharge of the ear did not. Four factors: etiology, Eustachian tube function, concomitant allergic rhinitis, and duration of the ear discharge were analyzed qualitatively.
Conclusions: The age of the patient, the size of the perforation, the opposite ear status, and the surgeon's experience have a significant effect on the success of tympanic membrane reconstruction. Further comprehensive studies are needed to analyze the interactions between the factors.
Level Of Evidence: Not applicable.
Acoustic Transmitted Decellularized Fish Bladder for Tympanic Membrane Regeneration.
Chen H, Zhang H, Zhu G, Cao L, Yu C, Duan M Research (Wash D C). 2025; 8:0596.
PMID: 39916796 PMC: 11794765. DOI: 10.34133/research.0596.
Rehman A, Deva F, Wani A, Masoodi M, Malik B, Makhdoomi O Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025; 29(1):1-9.
PMID: 39897076 PMC: 11785424. DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1791730.
Hearing results following endoscopic type I tympanoplasty in medium and large perforations.
Yue L, Liu X, Liu H, Ma H Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2024; 91(1):101509.
PMID: 39388826 PMC: 11497442. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2024.101509.
Collagen Matrix to Restore the Tympanic Membrane: Developing a Novel Platform to Treat Perforations.
Svistushkin M, Kotova S, Zolotova A, Fayzullin A, Antoshin A, Serejnikova N Polymers (Basel). 2024; 16(2).
PMID: 38257047 PMC: 10820519. DOI: 10.3390/polym16020248.