» Articles » PMID: 36807002

Methods of Forensic Facial Reconstruction and Human Identification: Historical Background, Significance, and Limitations

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2023 Feb 22
PMID 36807002
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Facial reconstruction is the most frequently used method for human identification in forensic examinations. It is a complex and time-consuming technique and an actively growing field with a wide array of applications. The methods of forensic facial reconstruction are helpful in those cases where other methods of identification are not applicable. Identification of the dead is always a challenging task for forensic teams in cases involving terrorists' attacks and mass disasters where the corpses are fragmented, decomposed, and skeletonized. In such cases, only the skeletal remains and few other clues are available to establish the identity of a person. The progress of facial reconstruction was initiated in the nineteenth century, reconstructing the facial profiles of some famous and rich people. Various novel techniques for facial reconstruction have been devised in the recent past. We conducted literature search, using databases PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect for analyzing different methods developed and practiced till date for human facial reconstruction. We outline the brief history along with a discussion regarding the different methods of forensic facial reconstruction and their limitations. We also discuss future recommendations and preferences for further research in the field of forensic facial reconstruction and human identification.

Citing Articles

Research progress on the application of 16S rRNA gene sequencing and machine learning in forensic microbiome individual identification.

Yang M, Wang Z, Zhai C, Chen L Front Microbiol. 2024; 15:1360457.

PMID: 38371926 PMC: 10869621. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1360457.

References
1.
Atsuchi M, Tsuji A, Usumoto Y, Yoshino M, Ikeda N . Assessment of some problematic factors in facial image identification using a 2D/3D superimposition technique. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2013; 15(5):244-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2013.06.002. View

2.
Aulsebrook W, Iscan M, Slabbert J, Becker P . Superimposition and reconstruction in forensic facial identification: a survey. Forensic Sci Int. 1995; 75(2-3):101-20. DOI: 10.1016/0379-0738(95)01770-4. View

3.
Bajnoczky I, Kiralyfalvi L . A new approach to computer-aided comparison of skull and photograph. Int J Legal Med. 1995; 108(3):157-61. DOI: 10.1007/BF01844829. View

4.
Birngruber C, Kreutz K, Ramsthaler F, Krahahn J, Verhoff M . Superimposition technique for skull identification with Afloat® software. Int J Legal Med. 2010; 124(5):471-5. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-010-0494-9. View

5.
Brough A, Rutty G, Black S, Morgan B . Post-mortem computed tomography and 3D imaging: anthropological applications for juvenile remains. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2012; 8(3):270-9. DOI: 10.1007/s12024-012-9344-z. View