» Articles » PMID: 36803117

A Clinical Indicator-based Prognostic Model Predicting Treatment Outcomes of Pulmonary Tuberculosis: a Prospective Cohort Study

Overview
Journal BMC Infect Dis
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2023 Feb 21
PMID 36803117
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Identifying prognostic factors helps optimize the treatment regimen and promote favorable outcomes. We conducted a prospective cohort study on patients with pulmonary tuberculosis to construct a clinical indicator-based model and estimate its performance.

Methods: We performed a two-stage study by recruiting 346 pulmonary tuberculosis patients diagnosed between 2016 and 2018 in Dafeng city as the training cohort and 132 patients diagnosed between 2018 and 2019 in Nanjing city as the external validation population. We generated a risk score based on blood and biochemistry examination indicators by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to assess the risk score, and the strength of association was expressed as the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). We plotted the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and calculated the area under the curve (AUC). Internal validation was conducted by 10-fold cross-validation.

Results: Ten significant indicators (PLT, PCV, LYMPH, MONO%, NEUT, NEUT%, TBTL, ALT, UA, and Cys-C) were selected to generate the risk score. Clinical indicator-based score (HR: 10.018, 95% CI: 4.904-20.468, P < 0.001), symptom-based score (HR: 1.356, 95% CI: 1.079-1.704, P = 0.009), pulmonary cavity (HR: 0.242, 95% CI: 0.087-0.674, P = 0.007), treatment history (HR: 2.810, 95% CI: 1.137-6.948, P = 0.025), and tobacco smoking (HR: 2.499, 95% CI: 1.097-5.691, P = 0.029) were significantly related to the treatment outcomes. The AUC was 0.766 (95% CI: 0.649-0.863) in the training cohort and 0.796 (95% CI: 0.630-0.928) in the validation dataset.

Conclusion: In addition to the traditional predictive factors, the clinical indicator-based risk score determined in this study has a good prediction effect on the prognosis of tuberculosis.

References
1.
Qiu F, Liang C, Liu H, Zeng Y, Hou S, Huang S . Impacts of cigarette smoking on immune responsiveness: Up and down or upside down?. Oncotarget. 2016; 8(1):268-284. PMC: 5352117. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.13613. View

2.
. Targeted tuberculin testing and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection. American Thoracic Society. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2000; 49(RR-6):1-51. View

3.
Panjabi R, Comstock G, Golub J . Recurrent tuberculosis and its risk factors: adequately treated patients are still at high risk. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2007; 11(8):828-37. View

4.
Kim C, Kim Y, Bae J, Kim A, Kim J, Son H . Risk factors of delayed isolation of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020; 26(8):1058-1062. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.01.032. View

5.
Lin H, Ezzati M, Murray M . Tobacco smoke, indoor air pollution and tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2007; 4(1):e20. PMC: 1769410. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040020. View