» Articles » PMID: 36802785

Mechanisms of Collective Learning: How Can Animal Groups Improve Collective Performance when Repeating a Task?

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2023 Feb 21
PMID 36802785
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Learning is ubiquitous in animals: individuals can use their experience to fine-tune behaviour and thus to better adapt to the environment during their lifetime. Observations have accumulated that, at the collective level, groups can also use their experience to improve collective performance. Yet, despite apparent simplicity, the links between individual learning capacities and a collective's performance can be extremely complex. Here we propose a centralized and broadly applicable framework to begin classifying this complexity. Focusing principally on groups with stable composition, we first identify three distinct ways through which groups can improve their collective performance when repeating a task: each member learning to better solve the task on its own, members learning about each other to better respond to one another and members learning to improve their complementarity. We show through selected empirical examples, simulations and theoretical treatments that these three categories identify distinct mechanisms with distinct consequences and predictions. These mechanisms extend well beyond current social learning and collective decision-making theories in explaining collective learning. Finally, our approach, definitions and categories help generate new empirical and theoretical research avenues, including charting the expected distribution of collective learning capacities across taxa and its links to social stability and evolution. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'Collective behaviour through time'.

Citing Articles

Animal personality in multiple stressor environments: the evolutionary ecology of among-individual differences in responses to stressor suites.

Grunst A, Grunst M Proc Biol Sci. 2024; 291(2033):20241620.

PMID: 39437842 PMC: 11495964. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.1620.


A multi-scale review of the dynamics of collective behaviour: from rapid responses to ontogeny and evolution.

Ioannou C, Laskowski K Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023; 378(1874):20220059.

PMID: 36802782 PMC: 9939272. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0059.

References
1.
Andrade-Lotero E, Goldstone R . Self-organized division of cognitive labor. PLoS One. 2021; 16(7):e0254532. PMC: 8289079. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254532. View

2.
Rivera-Caceres K, Templeton C . A duetting perspective on avian song learning. Behav Processes. 2017; 163:71-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.12.007. View

3.
Riotte-Lambert L, Benhamou S, Chamaille-Jammes S . How memory-based movement leads to nonterritorial spatial segregation. Am Nat. 2015; 185(4):E103-16. DOI: 10.1086/680009. View

4.
Heyes C . Social learning in animals: categories and mechanisms. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1994; 69(2):207-31. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1994.tb01506.x. View

5.
Sasaki T, Biro D . Cumulative culture can emerge from collective intelligence in animal groups. Nat Commun. 2017; 8:15049. PMC: 5399285. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15049. View