Foreign RNA Spike-ins Enable Accurate Allele-specific Expression Analysis at Scale

Overview

Journal bioRxiv

Date 2023 Feb 17

PMID 36798258

Authors

Asia Mendelevich

Saumya Gupta

Aleksei Pakharev

Athanasios Teodosiadis

Andrey A Mironov

Alexander A Gimelbrant

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Motivation: Analysis of allele-specific expression is strongly affected by the technical noise present in RNA-seq experiments. Previously, we showed that technical replicates can be used for precise estimates of this noise, and we provided a tool for correction of technical noise in allele-specific expression analysis. This approach is very accurate but costly due to the need for two or more replicates of each library. Here, we develop a spike-in approach that is highly accurate at only a small fraction of the cost.

Results: We show that a distinct RNA added as a spike-in before library preparation reflects technical noise of the whole library and can be used in large batches of samples. We experimentally demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach using combinations of RNA from species distinguishable by alignment, namely, mouse, human, and . Our new approach, controlFreq , enables highly accurate and computationally efficient analysis of allele-specific expression in (and between) arbitrarily large studies at an overall cost increase of ~ 5%.

Availability: Analysis pipeline for this approach is available at GitHub as R package controlFreq ( github.com/gimelbrantlab/controlFreq ).

Contact: agimelbrant@altius.org.

References

Tucci V, Isles A, Kelsey G, Ferguson-Smith A . Genomic Imprinting and Physiological Processes in Mammals. Cell. 2019; 176(5):952-965. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.043. View

Mendelevich A, Vinogradova S, Gupta S, Mironov A, Sunyaev S, Gimelbrant A . Replicate sequencing libraries are important for quantification of allelic imbalance. Nat Commun. 2021; 12(1):3370. PMC: 8184992. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-23544-8. View

Moyerbrailean G, Richards A, Kurtz D, Kalita C, Davis G, Harvey C . High-throughput allele-specific expression across 250 environmental conditions. Genome Res. 2016; 26(12):1627-1638. PMC: 5131815. DOI: 10.1101/gr.209759.116. View

Kim J, Kolodziejczyk A, Ilicic T, Illicic T, Teichmann S, Marioni J . Characterizing noise structure in single-cell RNA-seq distinguishes genuine from technical stochastic allelic expression. Nat Commun. 2015; 6:8687. PMC: 4627577. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms9687. View

Brennecke P, Anders S, Kim J, Kolodziejczyk A, Zhang X, Proserpio V . Accounting for technical noise in single-cell RNA-seq experiments. Nat Methods. 2013; 10(11):1093-5. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2645. View

Gendrel A, Attia M, Chen C, Diabangouaya P, Servant N, Barillot E . Developmental dynamics and disease potential of random monoallelic gene expression. Dev Cell. 2014; 28(4):366-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.01.016. View

Grun D, Kester L, van Oudenaarden A . Validation of noise models for single-cell transcriptomics. Nat Methods. 2014; 11(6):637-40. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2930. View

Vinogradova S, Saksena S, Ward H, Vigneau S, Gimelbrant A . MaGIC: a machine learning tool set and web application for monoallelic gene inference from chromatin. BMC Bioinformatics. 2019; 20(1):106. PMC: 6394031. DOI: 10.1186/s12859-019-2679-7. View

Nica A, Dermitzakis E . Expression quantitative trait loci: present and future. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013; 368(1620):20120362. PMC: 3682727. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0362. View

10.

Jiang L, Schlesinger F, Davis C, Zhang Y, Li R, Salit M . Synthetic spike-in standards for RNA-seq experiments. Genome Res. 2011; 21(9):1543-51. PMC: 3166838. DOI: 10.1101/gr.121095.111. View

11.

Chess A . Monoallelic Gene Expression in Mammals. Annu Rev Genet. 2016; 50:317-327. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genet-120215-035120. View

12.

Nag A, Savova V, Fung H, Miron A, Yuan G, Zhang K . Chromatin signature of widespread monoallelic expression. Elife. 2014; 2:e01256. PMC: 3873816. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.01256. View

13.

Loven J, Orlando D, Sigova A, Lin C, Rahl P, Burge C . Revisiting global gene expression analysis. Cell. 2012; 151(3):476-82. PMC: 3505597. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.012. View

14.

Uechi L, Jalali M, Wilbur J, French J, Jumbe N, Meaney M . Complex genetic dependencies among growth and neurological phenotypes in healthy children: Towards deciphering developmental mechanisms. PLoS One. 2020; 15(12):e0242684. PMC: 7714163. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242684. View

15.

Deng Q, Ramskold D, Reinius B, Sandberg R . Single-cell RNA-seq reveals dynamic, random monoallelic gene expression in mammalian cells. Science. 2014; 343(6167):193-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.1245316. View

16.

Vierstra J, Lazar J, Sandstrom R, Halow J, Lee K, Bates D . Global reference mapping of human transcription factor footprints. Nature. 2020; 583(7818):729-736. PMC: 7410829. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2528-x. View

17.

Zwemer L, Zak A, Thompson B, Kirby A, Daly M, Chess A . Autosomal monoallelic expression in the mouse. Genome Biol. 2012; 13(2):R10. PMC: 3334567. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-2-r10. View

18.

Wittkopp P, Kalay G . Cis-regulatory elements: molecular mechanisms and evolutionary processes underlying divergence. Nat Rev Genet. 2011; 13(1):59-69. DOI: 10.1038/nrg3095. View

19.

Battle A, Brown C, Engelhardt B, Montgomery S . Genetic effects on gene expression across human tissues. Nature. 2017; 550(7675):204-213. PMC: 5776756. DOI: 10.1038/nature24277. View

20.

Galupa R, Heard E . X-Chromosome Inactivation: A Crossroads Between Chromosome Architecture and Gene Regulation. Annu Rev Genet. 2018; 52:535-566. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genet-120116-024611. View