» Articles » PMID: 36797754

Gene Expression Differences Consistent with Water Loss Reduction Underlie Desiccation Tolerance of Natural Drosophila Populations

Overview
Journal BMC Biol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2023 Feb 16
PMID 36797754
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Climate change is one of the main factors shaping the distribution and biodiversity of organisms, among others by greatly altering water availability, thus exposing species and ecosystems to harsh desiccation conditions. However, most of the studies so far have focused on the effects of increased temperature. Integrating transcriptomics and physiology is key to advancing our knowledge on how species cope with desiccation stress, and these studies are still best accomplished in model organisms.

Results: Here, we characterized the natural variation of European D. melanogaster populations across climate zones and found that strains from arid regions were similar or more tolerant to desiccation compared with strains from temperate regions. Tolerant and sensitive strains differed not only in their transcriptomic response to stress but also in their basal expression levels. We further showed that gene expression changes in tolerant strains correlated with their physiological response to desiccation stress and with their cuticular hydrocarbon composition, and functionally validated three of the candidate genes identified. Transposable elements, which are known to influence stress response across organisms, were not found to be enriched nearby differentially expressed genes. Finally, we identified several tRNA-derived small RNA fragments that differentially targeted genes in response to desiccation stress.

Conclusions: Overall, our results showed that basal gene expression differences across individuals should be analyzed if we are to understand the genetic basis of differential stress survival. Moreover, tRNA-derived small RNA fragments appear to be relevant across stress responses and allow for the identification of stress-response genes not detected at the transcriptional level.

Citing Articles

Thermal Development, Mortality, and Fertility of an Apulian Strain of at Different Temperatures.

Baser N, Rossini L, Anfora G, Temel K, Gualano S, Garone E Insects. 2025; 16(1).

PMID: 39859641 PMC: 11766119. DOI: 10.3390/insects16010060.


Cuticular hydrocarbons promote desiccation resistance by preventing transpiration in Drosophila melanogaster.

Nayal K, Krupp J, Abdalla O, Levine J J Exp Biol. 2024; 227(23).

PMID: 39445981 PMC: 11634026. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.247752.


Genomic Diversity Illuminates the Environmental Adaptation of Drosophila suzukii.

Feng S, DeGrey S, Guedot C, Schoville S, Pool J Genome Biol Evol. 2024; 16(9).

PMID: 39235033 PMC: 11421661. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evae195.


Gene expression and genetic divergence in oak species highlight adaptive genes to soil water constraints.

Le Provost G, Brachi B, Lesur I, Lalanne C, Labadie K, Aury J Plant Physiol. 2022; 190(4):2466-2483.

PMID: 36066428 PMC: 9706432. DOI: 10.1093/plphys/kiac420.


Population-scale long-read sequencing uncovers transposable elements associated with gene expression variation and adaptive signatures in Drosophila.

Rech G, Radio S, Guirao-Rico S, Aguilera L, Horvath V, Green L Nat Commun. 2022; 13(1):1948.

PMID: 35413957 PMC: 9005704. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-29518-8.

References
1.
Liao Y, Smyth G, Shi W . featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2013; 30(7):923-30. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656. View

2.
Addo-Bediako A, Chown S, Gaston K . Revisiting water loss in insects: a large scale view. J Insect Physiol. 2003; 47(12):1377-1388. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1910(01)00128-7. View

3.
Laws A, Belovsky G . How will species respond to climate change? Examining the effects of temperature and population density on an herbivorous insect. Environ Entomol. 2010; 39(2):312-9. DOI: 10.1603/EN09294. View

4.
Kant P, Kant S, Gordon M, Shaked R, Barak S . STRESS RESPONSE SUPPRESSOR1 and STRESS RESPONSE SUPPRESSOR2, two DEAD-box RNA helicases that attenuate Arabidopsis responses to multiple abiotic stresses. Plant Physiol. 2007; 145(3):814-30. PMC: 2048787. DOI: 10.1104/pp.107.099895. View

5.
Rajpurohit S, Nedved O, Gibbs A . Meta-analysis of geographical clines in desiccation tolerance of Indian drosophilids. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2012; 164(2):391-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2012.11.013. View