General Anesthesia Compared With Non-GA in Endovascular Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Affiliations
Background And Objectives: Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke is either performed under general anesthesia (GA) or with non-GA techniques such as conscious sedation or local anesthesia alone. Previous small meta-analyses have demonstrated superior recanalization rates and improved functional recovery with GA when compared with non-GA techniques. The publication of further randomized controlled trials (RCTs) could provide updated guidance when choosing between GA and non-GA techniques.
Methods: A systematic search for trials in which stroke EVT patients were randomized to GA or non-GA was performed in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. A systematic review and meta-analysis using a random-effects model was performed.
Results: Seven RCTs were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. These trials included a total of 980 participants (GA, N = 487; non-GA, N = 493). GA improves recanalization by 9.0% (GA 84.6% vs non-GA 75.6%; odds ratio [OR] 1.75, 95% CI 1.26-2.42, = 0.0009), and the proportion of patients with functional recovery improves by 8.4% (GA 44.6% vs non-GA 36.2%; OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.04-1.98, = 0.03). There was no difference in hemorrhagic complications or 3-month mortality.
Discussion: In patients with ischemic stroke treated with EVT, GA is associated with higher recanalization rates and improved functional recovery at 3 months compared with non-GA techniques. Conversion to GA and subsequent intention-to-treat analysis will underestimate the true therapeutic benefit. GA is established as effective in improving recanalization rates in EVT (7 Class 1 studies) with a high Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) certainty rating. GA is established as effective in improving functional recovery at 3 months in EVT (5 Class 1 studies) with a moderate GRADE certainty rating. Stroke services need to develop pathways to incorporate GA as the first choice for most EVT procedures in acute ischemic stroke with a level A recommendation for recanalization and level B recommendation for functional recovery.
Hahn M, Brockstedt L, Groschel S, Geschke K, Grauhan N, Brockmann M Front Aging Neurosci. 2025; 17:1486726.
PMID: 40026421 PMC: 11868270. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1486726.
Riegler C, Rucker V, von Rennenberg R, Bollweg K, Cheng B, Alegiani A Front Neurol. 2025; 15:1517276.
PMID: 40008260 PMC: 11850263. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1517276.
Jafarli A, Di Napoli M, Kasper R, Saver J, McCullough L, Salehi-Omran S J Clin Med. 2025; 14(4).
PMID: 40004882 PMC: 11856848. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14041354.
[Acute ischemic stroke treatment].
Hussain M, Purrucker J, Ringleb P, Schonenberger S Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2025; 120(2):120-128.
PMID: 39789337 DOI: 10.1007/s00063-024-01233-w.
Zhou Y, Wang Y, Xu L Open Med (Wars). 2024; 19(1):20241085.
PMID: 39711844 PMC: 11662949. DOI: 10.1515/med-2024-1085.