» Articles » PMID: 36797071

General Anesthesia Compared With Non-GA in Endovascular Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Overview
Journal Neurology
Specialty Neurology
Date 2023 Feb 16
PMID 36797071
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objectives: Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke is either performed under general anesthesia (GA) or with non-GA techniques such as conscious sedation or local anesthesia alone. Previous small meta-analyses have demonstrated superior recanalization rates and improved functional recovery with GA when compared with non-GA techniques. The publication of further randomized controlled trials (RCTs) could provide updated guidance when choosing between GA and non-GA techniques.

Methods: A systematic search for trials in which stroke EVT patients were randomized to GA or non-GA was performed in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. A systematic review and meta-analysis using a random-effects model was performed.

Results: Seven RCTs were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. These trials included a total of 980 participants (GA, N = 487; non-GA, N = 493). GA improves recanalization by 9.0% (GA 84.6% vs non-GA 75.6%; odds ratio [OR] 1.75, 95% CI 1.26-2.42, = 0.0009), and the proportion of patients with functional recovery improves by 8.4% (GA 44.6% vs non-GA 36.2%; OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.04-1.98, = 0.03). There was no difference in hemorrhagic complications or 3-month mortality.

Discussion: In patients with ischemic stroke treated with EVT, GA is associated with higher recanalization rates and improved functional recovery at 3 months compared with non-GA techniques. Conversion to GA and subsequent intention-to-treat analysis will underestimate the true therapeutic benefit. GA is established as effective in improving recanalization rates in EVT (7 Class 1 studies) with a high Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) certainty rating. GA is established as effective in improving functional recovery at 3 months in EVT (5 Class 1 studies) with a moderate GRADE certainty rating. Stroke services need to develop pathways to incorporate GA as the first choice for most EVT procedures in acute ischemic stroke with a level A recommendation for recanalization and level B recommendation for functional recovery.

Citing Articles

Delirium following mechanical thrombectomy for ischemic stroke - individuals at risk, imaging biomarkers and prognosis.

Hahn M, Brockstedt L, Groschel S, Geschke K, Grauhan N, Brockmann M Front Aging Neurosci. 2025; 17:1486726.

PMID: 40026421 PMC: 11868270. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1486726.


Time trends in mechanical thrombectomy (2017-2021): do real-world data reflect advances in evidence?.

Riegler C, Rucker V, von Rennenberg R, Bollweg K, Cheng B, Alegiani A Front Neurol. 2025; 15:1517276.

PMID: 40008260 PMC: 11850263. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1517276.


Trends in Ischemic Stroke Hospitalization and Outcomes in the United States Pre- and Peri-COVID-19 Pandemic: A National Inpatient Sample Study.

Jafarli A, Di Napoli M, Kasper R, Saver J, McCullough L, Salehi-Omran S J Clin Med. 2025; 14(4).

PMID: 40004882 PMC: 11856848. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14041354.


[Acute ischemic stroke treatment].

Hussain M, Purrucker J, Ringleb P, Schonenberger S Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2025; 120(2):120-128.

PMID: 39789337 DOI: 10.1007/s00063-024-01233-w.


The potential risk factors of postoperative cognitive dysfunction for endovascular therapy in acute ischemic stroke with general anesthesia.

Zhou Y, Wang Y, Xu L Open Med (Wars). 2024; 19(1):20241085.

PMID: 39711844 PMC: 11662949. DOI: 10.1515/med-2024-1085.


References
1.
Simonsen C, Yoo A, Sorensen L, Juul N, Johnsen S, Andersen G . Effect of General Anesthesia and Conscious Sedation During Endovascular Therapy on Infarct Growth and Clinical Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2018; 75(4):470-477. PMC: 5885172. DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.4474. View

2.
Ishida K, Berger M, Nadler J, Warner D . Anesthetic neuroprotection: antecedents and an appraisal of preclinical and clinical data quality. Curr Pharm Des. 2014; 20(36):5751-65. DOI: 10.2174/1381612820666140204111701. View

3.
Henden P, Rentzos A, Karlsson J, Rosengren L, Leiram B, Sundeman H . General Anesthesia Versus Conscious Sedation for Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke: The AnStroke Trial (Anesthesia During Stroke). Stroke. 2017; 48(6):1601-1607. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.016554. View

4.
Archer D, Walker A, McCann S, Moser J, Appireddy R . Anesthetic Neuroprotection in Experimental Stroke in Rodents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Anesthesiology. 2017; 126(4):653-665. PMC: 5354268. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001534. View

5.
Bekelis K, Missios S, MacKenzie T, Tjoumakaris S, Jabbour P . Anesthesia Technique and Outcomes of Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke. Stroke. 2017; 48(2):361-366. PMC: 5263179. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015343. View