» Articles » PMID: 36796257

Overlapping and Unique Brain Responses to Cognitive and Response Inhibition

Overview
Journal Brain Cogn
Specialties Neurology
Psychiatry
Date 2023 Feb 16
PMID 36796257
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although cognitive inhibition and response inhibition fall under the umbrella term of inhibition, the question remains whether the two aspects of inhibition engage shared or distinct brain regions. The current study is one of the first to examine the neural underpinnings of cognitive inhibition (e.g. the Stroop incongruency effect) and response inhibition (e.g. "no-go" response) within a single task. Adult participants (n = 77) completed an adapted version of the Simon Task in a 3T MRI scanner. The results demonstrated that cognitive and response inhibition recruited a group of overlapping brain regions (inferior frontal cortex, inferior temporal lobe, precentral cortex, parietal cortex). However, a direct comparison of cognitive and response inhibition revealed that the two aspects of inhibition also engaged distinct, task-specific brain regions (voxel-wise FWE corrected p < 0.05). Cognitive inhibition was associated with increases in multiple brain regions within the prefrontal cortex. On the other hand, response inhibition was associated with increases in distinct regions of the prefrontal cortex, right superior parietal cortex, and inferior temporal lobe. Our findings advance the understanding of the brain basis of inhibition by suggesting that cognitive inhibition and response inhibition engage overlapping but distinct brain regions.

Citing Articles

Naturalistic assessments across the lifespan: Systematic review of inhibition measures in ecological settings.

Dina L, Smith T, Hauser T, Dommett E Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2024; 167:105915.

PMID: 39395771 PMC: 11870848. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105915.

References
1.
Hannah R, Muralidharan V, Aron A . Failing to attend versus failing to stop: Single-trial decomposition of action-stopping in the stop signal task. Behav Res Methods. 2022; 55(8):4099-4117. PMC: 10700434. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-022-02008-x. View

2.
Migliaccio R, Tanguy D, Bouzigues A, Sezer I, Dubois B, Le Ber I . Cognitive and behavioural inhibition deficits in neurodegenerative dementias. Cortex. 2020; 131:265-283. PMC: 7416687. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.08.001. View

3.
Hadland K, Rushworth M, Gaffan D, Passingham R . The anterior cingulate and reward-guided selection of actions. J Neurophysiol. 2003; 89(2):1161-4. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00634.2002. View

4.
Barch D . The cognitive neuroscience of schizophrenia. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2007; 1:321-53. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.143959. View

5.
Lipszyc J, Schachar R . Inhibitory control and psychopathology: a meta-analysis of studies using the stop signal task. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2010; 16(6):1064-76. DOI: 10.1017/S1355617710000895. View