A Three Step Protocol for the Development of an Innovative Footwear (shoe and Sensor Based Insole) to Prevent Diabetic Foot Ulceration

Overview

Journal Front Public Health

Specialty Public Health

Date 2023 Feb 16

PMID 36794077

Authors

Liliana B Sousa

Ines Almeida

Rafael A Bernardes

Teofilo R Leite

Rui Negrao

Joao Apostolo

Anabela Salgueiro-Oliveira

Pedro Parreira

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The incidence of diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) is increasing worldwide. Therapeutic footwear is usually recommended in clinical practice for preventing foot ulcers in persons with diabetes. The project Science DiabetICC Footwear aims to develop innovative footwear to prevent DFU, specifically a shoe and sensor-based insole, which will allow for monitoring pressure, temperature, and humidity parameters.

Method: This study presents a three-step protocol for the development and evaluation of this therapeutic footwear, specifically: (i) a first observational study will specify the user requirements and contexts of use; (ii) after the design solutions were developed for shoe and insole, the semi-functional prototypes will be evaluated against the initial requirements; (iii) and a pre-clinical study protocol will enable the evaluation of the final functional prototype. The eligible diabetic participants will be involved in each stage of product development. The data will be collected using interviews, clinical evaluation of the foot, 3D foot parameters and plantar pressure evaluation. This three-step protocol was defined according to the national and international legal requirements, ISO norms for medical devices development, and was also reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA: E) of the Nursing School of Coimbra (ESEnfC).

Results: The involvement of end-users (diabetic patients) will enable the definition of user requirements and contexts of use to develop design solutions for the footwear. Those design solutions will be prototyped and evaluated by end-users to achieve the final design for therapeutic footwear. The final functional prototype will be evaluated in pre-clinical studies to ensure that the footwear meets all the requirements to move forward to clinical studies.

Discussion: The three-step study outlined in this protocol will provide the necessary insights during the product development, ensuring this new therapeutic footwear's main functional and ergonomic features for DFU prevention.

Citing Articles

Research hotspots and trends in nursing for diabetic foot ulcers: A bibliometric analysis from 2013 to 2023.

Li X, Chen D, Wang C, Fan J, Wang Z, Liu Y Heliyon. 2024; 10(16):e36009.

PMID: 39224296 PMC: 11367126. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36009.

Recent Innovations in Footwear and the Role of Smart Footwear in Healthcare-A Survey.

Rukmini P, Hegde R, Basavarajappa B, Bhat A, Pujari A, Gargiulo G Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(13).

PMID: 39001080 PMC: 11243832. DOI: 10.3390/s24134301.

References

Putti A, Arnold G, Cochrane L, Abboud R . The Pedar in-shoe system: repeatability and normal pressure values. Gait Posture. 2006; 25(3):401-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.05.010. View

Elberse J, Pittens C, de Cock Buning T, Broerse J . Patient involvement in a scientific advisory process: setting the research agenda for medical products. Health Policy. 2012; 107(2-3):231-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.05.014. View

Smith M, Hammad T, Metcalf M, Levitan B, Noel R, Wolka A . Patient Engagement at a Tipping Point-The Need for Cultural Change Across Patient, Sponsor, and Regulator Stakeholders: Insights From the DIA Conference, "Patient Engagement in Benefit Risk Assessment Throughout the Life Cycle of Medical Products". Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2018; 50(5):546-553. DOI: 10.1177/2168479016662902. View

Paixao J, de Oliveira F, Guimaraes N, Machado J, de Souza M . MICRO-CONTROLLED THERMAL STIMULATOR FOR DETECTING FINE FIBER CHANGES IN PATIENTS WITH DIABETES MELLITUS: A DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY STUDY. Prim Care Diabetes. 2021; 15(3):548-553. DOI: 10.1016/j.pcd.2021.01.004. View

Collings R, Freeman J, Latour J, Paton J . Footwear and insole design features for offloading the diabetic at risk foot-A systematic review and meta-analyses. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2021; 4(1):e00132. PMC: 7831212. DOI: 10.1002/edm2.132. View

Allan J, Munro W, Figgins E . Foot deformities within the diabetic foot and their influence on biomechanics: A review of the literature. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2015; 40(2):182-92. DOI: 10.1177/0309364615592705. View

Parreira P, Sousa L, Marques I, Santos-Costa P, Cortez S, Carneiro F . Usability Assessment of an Innovative Device in Infusion Therapy: A Mix-Method Approach Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(22). PMC: 7698130. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17228335. View

Flanagin A, Fontanarosa P, DeAngelis C . Authorship for research groups. JAMA. 2002; 288(24):3166-8. DOI: 10.1001/jama.288.24.3166. View

Matheson A . How industry uses the ICMJE guidelines to manipulate authorship--and how they should be revised. PLoS Med. 2011; 8(8):e1001072. PMC: 3153455. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001072. View

10.

Borsci S, Uchegbu I, Buckle P, Ni Z, Walne S, Hanna G . Designing medical technology for resilience: integrating health economics and human factors approaches. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2017; 15(1):15-26. DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2018.1418661. View

11.

Manne-Goehler J, Geldsetzer P, Agoudavi K, Andall-Brereton G, Aryal K, Bicaba B . Health system performance for people with diabetes in 28 low- and middle-income countries: A cross-sectional study of nationally representative surveys. PLoS Med. 2019; 16(3):e1002751. PMC: 6396901. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002751. View

12.

Schmidt S, Muhlan H, Power M . The EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index: psychometric results of a cross-cultural field study. Eur J Public Health. 2005; 16(4):420-8. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/cki155. View

13.

Crawford F, Cezard G, Chappell F, Murray G, Price J, Sheikh A . A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of prognostic factors for foot ulceration in people with diabetes: the international research collaboration for the prediction of diabetic foot ulcerations (PODUS). Health Technol Assess. 2015; 19(57):1-210. PMC: 4781379. DOI: 10.3310/hta19570. View

14.

Murray G, Butcher I, Heald C, Lee R, Chambless L, Folsom A . Ankle brachial index combined with Framingham Risk Score to predict cardiovascular events and mortality: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2008; 300(2):197-208. PMC: 2932628. DOI: 10.1001/jama.300.2.197. View

15.

van Netten J, Prijs M, van Baal J, Liu C, van der Heijden F, Bus S . Diagnostic values for skin temperature assessment to detect diabetes-related foot complications. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014; 16(11):714-21. DOI: 10.1089/dia.2014.0052. View

16.

Afolabi B, Idowu B, Onigbinde S . Achilles tendon degeneration on ultrasound in type 2 diabetic patients. J Ultrason. 2021; 20(83):e291-e299. PMC: 7830069. DOI: 10.15557/JoU.2020.0051. View

17.

Sena E, Currie G, McCann S, Macleod M, Howells D . Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of preclinical studies: why perform them and how to appraise them critically. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2014; 34(5):737-42. PMC: 4013765. DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.28. View

18.

Bus S, van Deursen R, Armstrong D, Lewis J, Caravaggi C, Cavanagh P . Footwear and offloading interventions to prevent and heal foot ulcers and reduce plantar pressure in patients with diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2015; 32 Suppl 1:99-118. DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.2702. View

19.

Schaper N, van Netten J, Apelqvist J, Bus S, Hinchliffe R, Lipsky B . Practical Guidelines on the prevention and management of diabetic foot disease (IWGDF 2019 update). Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020; 36 Suppl 1:e3266. DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.3266. View

20.

Wijlens A, Holloway S, Bus S, van Netten J . An explorative study on the validity of various definitions of a 2·2°C temperature threshold as warning signal for impending diabetic foot ulceration. Int Wound J. 2017; 14(6):1346-1351. PMC: 7949930. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12811. View