» Articles » PMID: 36790628

Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF): Influence of Layer Height on Forces and Moments Delivered by Aligners-an in Vitro Study

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2023 Feb 15
PMID 36790628
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the effect of layer height of FFF-printed models on aligner force transmission to a second maxillary premolar during buccal torquing, distalization, extrusion, and rotation using differing foil thicknesses.

Materials And Methods: Utilizing OnyxCeph™ Lab (Image Instruments GmbH, Chemnitz, Germany, Release Version 3.2.185), the following movements were programmed for the second premolar: buccal torque (0.1-0.5 mm), distalization (0.1-0.4 mm), extrusion (0.1-0.4 mm), rotation (0.1-0.5 mm), and staging 0.1 mm. Via FFF, 91 maxillary models were printed for each staging at different layer heights (100 µm, 150 µm, 200 µm, 250 µm, 300 µm). Hence, 182 aligners, made of polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PET-G) with two thicknesses (0.5 mm and 0.75 mm), were prepared. The test setup comprised an acrylic maxillary model with the second premolar separated and mounted on a sensor, measuring initial forces and moments exerted by the aligners. A generalized linear model for the gamma distribution was applied, evaluating the significance of the factors layer height, type of movement, aligner thickness, and staging on aligner force transmission.

Results: Foil thickness and staging were found to have a significant influence on forces delivered by aligners, whereas no significance was determined for layer height and type of movement. Nevertheless, at a layer height of 150 µm, the most appropriate force transmission was observed.

Conclusions: Printing aligner models at particularly low layer heights leads to uneconomically high print time without perceptible better force delivery properties, whereas higher layer heights provoke higher unpredictability of forces due to scattering. A z-resolution of 150 µm appears ideal for in-office aligner production combining advantages of economic print time and optimal force transmission.

Citing Articles

Effectiveness of different intrusion modes of maxillary anterior teeth with mini-implants in clear aligner treatment: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Xiao T, Su J, Lei J, Zhang X, Yu J, Nie X BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):758.

PMID: 38956625 PMC: 11218253. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04537-7.

References
1.
Tetsuka H, Shin S . Materials and technical innovations in 3D printing in biomedical applications. J Mater Chem B. 2020; 8(15):2930-2950. PMC: 8092991. DOI: 10.1039/d0tb00034e. View

2.
Liu F, Liu C, Chen Q, Ao Q, Tian X, Fan J . Progress in organ 3D bioprinting. Int J Bioprint. 2020; 4(1):128. PMC: 7582006. DOI: 10.18063/IJB.v4i1.128. View

3.
Kamio T, Hayashi K, Onda T, Takaki T, Shibahara T, Yakushiji T . Utilizing a low-cost desktop 3D printer to develop a "one-stop 3D printing lab" for oral and maxillofacial surgery and dentistry fields. 3D Print Med. 2018; 4(1):6. PMC: 6097791. DOI: 10.1186/s41205-018-0028-5. View

4.
Behyar M, Ratzmann A, Shojaei Khatouni S, Quasthoff M, Pink C, Ladisch J . Modular 3D printable orthodontic measuring apparatus for force and torque measurements of thermoplastic/removable appliances. Biomed Tech (Berl). 2021; 66(6):593-601. DOI: 10.1515/bmt-2020-0294. View

5.
Liu Y, Hu W . Force changes associated with different intrusion strategies for deep-bite correction by clear aligners. Angle Orthod. 2018; 88(6):771-778. PMC: 8174064. DOI: 10.2319/121717-864.1. View