» Articles » PMID: 36790588

Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein is a Robust Biomarker in Cerebrospinal Fluid and Peripheral Blood After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: a Prospective Pilot Study

Overview
Specialty Neurosurgery
Date 2023 Feb 15
PMID 36790588
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Biochemical biomarkers to determine the injury severity and the potential for functional recovery of traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) are highly warranted; however, it remains to be clarified whether cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or peripheral blood (PB) is the ideal sample media. This study aims to measure and compare biomarker concentrations in CSF and PB and to explore associations between biomarker concentrations and injury severity, i.e., American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) grade, and biomarker concentrations and clinical outcome, i.e., AIS grade improvement and Spinal Cord Independent Measure version III (SCIM-III) score.

Methods: From 2018 to 2020, we conducted a single-center prospective pilot study of TSCI patients (n=15) and healthy controls (n=15). Sample collection and clinical outcome assessment were performed at median 13 h [IQR: 19], 9 days [IQR: 2], and 148 days [IQR: 49] after TSCI. Concentrations of neuron-specific enolase (NSE); glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP); neurofilament light chain (NfL); interferon-γ (IFN-γ); interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12p70, and IL-13; and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) were measured and associated to clinical outcomes.

Results: The biomarker concentrations were higher in CSF than PB. CSF concentrations of GFAP, NSE, IFN-y, TNF-a, IL-2, IL-12p70, IL-4, IL-10, and IL-13 and PB concentrations of GFAP and IFN-y were significantly associated with AIS grade, but not with AIS grade improvement or SCIM-III score.

Conclusions: Our results support GFAP as a potential diagnostic biomarker that may be measured in CSF as well as PB.

Citing Articles

MRI variables and peripheral inflammatory response biomarkers predict severity and prognosis in patients with acute cervical traumatic spinal cord injury.

Ding Z, Zhou W, Wang D, Li L, Wang C, Wang C BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):900.

PMID: 39533270 PMC: 11558895. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-08038-0.


Axonal Growth and Fasciculation of Spinal Neurons Promoted by Aldynoglia in Alkaline Fibrin Hydrogel: Influence of Tol-51 Sulfoglycolipid.

Buzoianu-Anguiano V, Arriero-Cabanero A, Fernandez-Mayoralas A, Torres-Llacsa M, Doncel-Perez E Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(17).

PMID: 39273121 PMC: 11395328. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25179173.


Admission levels of serum biomarkers have additive and cumulative prognostic value in traumatic brain injury.

Kaaber I, Lesbo M, Wichmann T, Olsen D, Rasmussen M, Brink O Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):14139.

PMID: 38898030 PMC: 11187066. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-64125-1.

References
1.
Abdelhak A, Foschi M, Abu-Rumeileh S, Yue J, DAnna L, Huss A . Blood GFAP as an emerging biomarker in brain and spinal cord disorders. Nat Rev Neurol. 2022; 18(3):158-172. DOI: 10.1038/s41582-021-00616-3. View

2.
Albayar A, Roche A, Swiatkowski P, Antar S, Ouda N, Emara E . Biomarkers in Spinal Cord Injury: Prognostic Insights and Future Potentials. Front Neurol. 2019; 10:27. PMC: 6361789. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00027. View

3.
Anderson K . Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. J Neurotrauma. 2005; 21(10):1371-83. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2004.21.1371. View

4.
Biglari B, Swing T, Child C, Buchler A, Westhauser F, Bruckner T . A pilot study on temporal changes in IL-1β and TNF-α serum levels after spinal cord injury: the serum level of TNF-α in acute SCI patients as a possible marker for neurological remission. Spinal Cord. 2015; 53(7):510-4. DOI: 10.1038/sc.2015.28. View

5.
Cao F, Yang X, Liu W, Hu W, Li G, Zheng X . Elevation of neuron-specific enolase and S-100beta protein level in experimental acute spinal cord injury. J Clin Neurosci. 2008; 15(5):541-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2007.05.014. View