» Articles » PMID: 36779982

Socioeconomic Factors and Adherence to Health Care Recommendations in Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors

Overview
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2023 Feb 13
PMID 36779982
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The majority of adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors do not receive recommended health care surveillance after therapy. We used cross-sectional survey data to evaluate the impact of income, education, marital status, and insurance on health care adherence among AYA survivors. Eligible survivors were 18-39 years at diagnosis with invasive malignancy, 1-5 years from therapy completion. Online surveys assessed sociodemographic factors and self-report of completion of recommended health care services. Diagnosis and treatment data were abstracted from medical records. Multivariable logistic regression calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for adherence in relation to socioeconomic status and support. Of 344 participants, 36% were adherent to at least 80% of recommendations. Adherence varied by cancer type: 34% for breast cancer, 52% for leukemia/lymphoma, 23% for other tumors. Adherence rates were similar among White, Asian, and Hispanic/Latinx patients. Lower adherence was associated with lower education (OR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.23-0.80 for <4-year college degree) and lower annual income (OR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.28-0.95 for $41,000-$80,000; OR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.19-0.86 for ≤$40,000). Adherence decreased with decreasing income levels among those who were 1 to less than 3 years after diagnosis (OR: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.07-0.93 for $81,000-$120,000; OR: 0.24; 95% CI: 0.07-0.84 for $41,000-$80,000; OR: 0.13; 95% CI: 0.03-0.60 for ≤$40,000). Risk of nonadherence to health care guidelines was associated with lower income and lower education among AYA cancer survivors. Identification of these risks and related barriers to adherence in AYA survivors will inform interventions designed to meet needs of these high-risk groups, particularly during the first years after diagnosis. Trial Registration: NCT02192333.

Citing Articles

Disparities in care and outcomes for adolescent and young adult lymphoma patients.

Rosenthal A, Duvall A, Kahn J, Khan N EJHaem. 2023; 4(4):934-939.

PMID: 38024615 PMC: 10660400. DOI: 10.1002/jha2.797.


The murine metastatic microenvironment of experimental brain metastases of breast cancer differs by host age in vivo: a proteomic study.

Hunt A, Khan I, Wu A, Makohon-Moore S, Hood B, Conrads K Clin Exp Metastasis. 2023; 41(3):229-249.

PMID: 37917186 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-023-10233-7.

References
1.
Karve S, Cleves M, Helm M, Hudson T, West D, Martin B . Good and poor adherence: optimal cut-point for adherence measures using administrative claims data. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009; 25(9):2303-10. DOI: 10.1185/03007990903126833. View

2.
Berkman A, Andersen C, Puthenpura V, Livingston J, Ahmed S, Cuglievan B . Impact of Race, Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Status over Time on the Long-term Survival of Adolescent and Young Adult Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021; 30(9):1717-1725. PMC: 8419153. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-0103. View

3.
Jacobsen P, DeRosa A, Henderson T, Mayer D, Moskowitz C, Paskett E . Systematic Review of the Impact of Cancer Survivorship Care Plans on Health Outcomes and Health Care Delivery. J Clin Oncol. 2018; 36(20):2088-2100. PMC: 6036622. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2018.77.7482. View

4.
Sirey J, Meyers B, Teresi J, Bruce M, Ramirez M, Raue P . The Cornell Service Index as a measure of health service use. Psychiatr Serv. 2005; 56(12):1564-9. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.56.12.1564. View

5.
Smith G, Lopez-Olivo M, Advani P, Ning M, Geng Y, Giordano S . Financial Burdens of Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review of Risk Factors and Outcomes. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019; 17(10):1184-1192. PMC: 7370695. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.7305. View