» Articles » PMID: 36778835

The Effect of Prone Positioning on Surgical Pleth Index in Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery Under General Anesthesia - A Prospective Observational Study

Overview
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 2023 Feb 13
PMID 36778835
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aims: Surgical Pleth Index (SPI) provides an objective assessment of nociception - anti-nociception balance but is influenced by multiple confounders. The effect of change of position on SPI, has not been studied extensively. The aim of the study was to observe the effect of prone positioning on SPI and its correlation with hemodynamic variables, in patients undergoing lumbar and thoracic spine surgery.

Material And Methods: This prospective observational pilot study included 14 patients. In addition to hemodynamic monitoring, SPI, entropy and pulse pressure variability (PPV) were monitored. Propofol and Fentanyl infusions were used for maintenance of anesthesia. The patients were made prone on bolsters and all the variables were recorded every 5 minutes in supine position and after making prone for 20 minutes, before and after incision, muscle splitting and laminectomy.

Results: Comparing the last value of the variables in the supine position with those immediately after making prone, SPI increased by 16.36 units ( = 0.003), followed by gradual reduction over the next 20 minutes. Mean arterial pressure and heart rate increased transiently (value = 0.028 and 0.025, respectively) without any significant change in PPV. Surgical incision also led to a significant increase in SPI.

Conclusion: Prone positioning leads to significant increase in SPI, probably due to increased sympathetic tone.

Citing Articles

Comparison of analgesia nociception index, surgical pleth index and hemodynamic parameters between patients receiving fentanyl versus dexmedetomidine analgesia for supratentorial craniotomy - an open label active-controlled randomized trial.

T L R, Kondavagilu Ramaprasannakumar S, Chakrabarti D, Sriganesh K, Bansal S J Clin Monit Comput. 2024; 39(1):25-33.

PMID: 39083121 DOI: 10.1007/s10877-024-01197-4.


Three cases of kyphoplasty performed in the lateral position due to significant comorbidities.

Aguirre A, Castaneda Aguayo F, Lagunas A, Mejia C Surg Neurol Int. 2024; 15:138.

PMID: 38742009 PMC: 11090546. DOI: 10.25259/SNI_83_2024.


Surgical pleth index monitoring in perioperative pain management: usefulness and limitations.

Oh S, Won Y, Lim B Korean J Anesthesiol. 2023; 77(1):31-45.

PMID: 36926752 PMC: 10834712. DOI: 10.4097/kja.23158.

References
1.
Bonhomme V, Uutela K, Hans G, Maquoi I, Born J, Brichant J . Comparison of the surgical Pleth Index™ with haemodynamic variables to assess nociception-anti-nociception balance during general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2010; 106(1):101-11. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeq291. View

2.
Sudheer P, Logan S, Ateleanu B, Hall J . Haemodynamic effects of the prone position: a comparison of propofol total intravenous and inhalation anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2006; 61(2):138-41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2005.04464.x. View

3.
Pump B, Talleruphuus U, Christensen N, Warberg J, Norsk P . Effects of supine, prone, and lateral positions on cardiovascular and renal variables in humans. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2002; 283(1):R174-80. DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00619.2001. View

4.
Wadsworth R, Anderton J, Vohra A . The effect of four different surgical prone positions on cardiovascular parameters in healthy volunteers. Anaesthesia. 1996; 51(9):819-22. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1996.tb12608.x. View

5.
Wennervirta J, Hynynen M, Koivusalo A, Uutela K, Huiku M, Vakkuri A . Surgical stress index as a measure of nociception/antinociception balance during general anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008; 52(8):1038-45. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01687.x. View