» Articles » PMID: 36777251

Influence of Porosity on Osteogenesis, Bone Growth and Osteointegration in Trabecular Tantalum Scaffolds Fabricated by Additive Manufacturing

Overview
Date 2023 Feb 13
PMID 36777251
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Porous tantalum implants are a class of materials commonly used in clinical practice to repair bone defects. However, the cumbersome and problematic preparation procedure have limited their widespread application. Additive manufacturing has revolutionized the design and process of orthopedic implants, but the pore architecture feature of porous tantalum scaffolds prepared from additive materials for optimal osseointegration are unclear, particularly the influence of porosity. We prepared trabecular bone-mimicking tantalum scaffolds with three different porosities (60%, 70% and 80%) using the laser powder bed fusing technique to examine and compare the effects of adhesion, proliferation and osteogenic differentiation capacity of rat mesenchymal stem cells on the scaffolds . The bone ingrowth and osseointegration effects of each scaffold were analyzed in a rat femoral bone defect model. Three porous tantalum scaffolds were successfully prepared and characterized. studies showed that scaffolds with 70% and 80% porosity had a better ability to osteogenic proliferation and differentiation than scaffolds with 60% porosity. studies further confirmed that tantalum scaffolds with the 70% and 80% porosity had a better ability for bone ingrowh than the scaffold with 60% porosity. As for osseointegration, more bone was bound to the material in the scaffold with 70% porosity, suggesting that the 3D printed trabecular tantalum scaffold with 70% porosity could be the optimal choice for subsequent implant design, which we will further confirm in a large animal preclinical model for better clinical use.

Citing Articles

Progress of porous tantalum surface-modified biomaterial coatings in bone tissue engineering.

Liu A, Wang C, Zhao Z, Zhu R, Deng S, Zhang S J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2025; 36(1):26.

PMID: 40042692 PMC: 11882692. DOI: 10.1007/s10856-025-06871-w.


Patient-Specific 3-Dimensional-Printed Orthopedic Implants and Surgical Devices Are Potential Alternatives to Conventional Technology But Require Additional Characterization.

McAnena A, McClennen T, Zheng H Clin Orthop Surg. 2025; 17(1):1-15.

PMID: 39912074 PMC: 11791502. DOI: 10.4055/cios23294.


Evaluation of biological performance of 3D printed trabecular porous tantalum spine fusion cage in large animal models.

Zhang Y, Yang J, Wan W, Zhao Q, Di M, Zhang D J Orthop Translat. 2025; 50:185-195.

PMID: 39895865 PMC: 11786794. DOI: 10.1016/j.jot.2024.10.010.


Advances in the application and research of biomaterials in promoting bone repair and regeneration through immune modulation.

Liu L, Chen H, Zhao X, Han Q, Xu Y, Liu Y Mater Today Bio. 2025; 30():101410.

PMID: 39811613 PMC: 11731593. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101410.


Effect of Artificial Saliva Modification on Corrosion Resistance of Metal Oxide Coatings on Co-Cr-Mo Dental Alloy.

Losiewicz B, Osak P, Gorka-Kulikowska K, Maszybrocka J Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(21).

PMID: 39517442 PMC: 11546479. DOI: 10.3390/ma17215166.


References
1.
Chen Y, Li W, Zhang C, Wu Z, Liu J . Recent Developments of Biomaterials for Additive Manufacturing of Bone Scaffolds. Adv Healthc Mater. 2020; 9(23):e2000724. DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202000724. View

2.
Gillman C, Jayasuriya A . FDA-approved bone grafts and bone graft substitute devices in bone regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2021; 130:112466. PMC: 8555702. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2021.112466. View

3.
Kuzyk P, Schemitsch E . The basic science of peri-implant bone healing. Indian J Orthop. 2011; 45(2):108-15. PMC: 3051116. DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.77129. View

4.
Bobyn J, Stackpool G, Hacking S, Tanzer M, Krygier J . Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999; 81(5):907-14. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.81b5.9283. View

5.
Amini A, Laurencin C, Nukavarapu S . Bone tissue engineering: recent advances and challenges. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2013; 40(5):363-408. PMC: 3766369. DOI: 10.1615/critrevbiomedeng.v40.i5.10. View