» Articles » PMID: 36772674

Using Wearable Inertial Sensors to Monitor Effectiveness of Different Types of Customized Orthoses During CrossFit Training

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2023 Feb 11
PMID 36772674
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Dynamic balance plays a key role in high-impact sports, such as CrossFit, where athletes are required to maintain balance in various weightlifting exercises. The loss of balance in these sport-specific movements may not only affect athlete performance, but also increase the risk of injuries.

Objectives: The aim of the study is to achieve greater insight into the balance and athlete position during the CrossFit training by means of inertial sensors, with a particular focus on the role of different custom foot orthoses (CFOs) in order to detect correlations with the role of the cavus foot.

Methods: A total of 42 CrossFit athletes, aged 25 to 42 years, were enrolled in this study. One-way ANOVA tests with post-hoc analysis of variance were used to compare foot posture groups and effects of different types of customized foot orthoses.

Results: When comparing the effects of CFOs with the respective balance basal level during the pistol squat exercise, we observed a significant ( = 0.0001) decrease in the sway area, antero-posterior displacement (APD) and medio-lateral displacement (MLD) compared to the basal using both types of CFOs.

Conclusion: No significant positive effects of CFOs were observed in some static tests. On the contrary, positive effects of CFOs and, in particular, postural insoles, are relevant to dynamic balance.

Citing Articles

Wearable Technology Applications and Methods to Assess Clinical Outcomes in Foot and Ankle Disorders: Achievements and Perspectives.

Brognara L, Mazzotti A, Zielli S, Arceri A, Artioli E, Traina F Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(21).

PMID: 39517956 PMC: 11548473. DOI: 10.3390/s24217059.


Gait Assessment Using Smartphone Applications in Older Adults: A Scoping Review.

Brognara L Geriatrics (Basel). 2024; 9(4).

PMID: 39051259 PMC: 11270307. DOI: 10.3390/geriatrics9040095.


Motion Capture Technology in Sports Scenarios: A Survey.

Suo X, Tang W, Li Z Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(9).

PMID: 38733052 PMC: 11086331. DOI: 10.3390/s24092947.


Hang-Time HAR: A Benchmark Dataset for Basketball Activity Recognition Using Wrist-Worn Inertial Sensors.

Hoelzemann A, Romero J, Bock M, Van Laerhoven K, Lv Q Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(13).

PMID: 37447730 PMC: 10346876. DOI: 10.3390/s23135879.

References
1.
Johnston W, OReilly M, Argent R, Caulfield B . Reliability, Validity and Utility of Inertial Sensor Systems for Postural Control Assessment in Sport Science and Medicine Applications: A Systematic Review. Sports Med. 2019; 49(5):783-818. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-019-01095-9. View

2.
Meyer J, Morrison J, Zuniga J . The Benefits and Risks of CrossFit: A Systematic Review. Workplace Health Saf. 2017; 65(12):612-618. DOI: 10.1177/2165079916685568. View

3.
Blaszczyk J . The use of force-plate posturography in the assessment of postural instability. Gait Posture. 2016; 44:1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.10.014. View

4.
Simkin A, Leichter I . Role of the calcaneal inclination in the energy storage capacity of the human foot--a biomechanical model. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1990; 28(2):149-52. DOI: 10.1007/BF02441770. View

5.
Croisier J, Ganteaume S, Binet J, Genty M, Ferret J . Strength imbalances and prevention of hamstring injury in professional soccer players: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2008; 36(8):1469-75. DOI: 10.1177/0363546508316764. View