» Articles » PMID: 36770074

3D-Printed Polycaprolactone Implants Modified with Bioglass and Zn-Doped Bioglass

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2023 Feb 11
PMID 36770074
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this work, composite filaments in the form of sticks and 3D-printed scaffolds were investigated as a future component of an osteochondral implant. The first part of the work focused on the development of a filament modified with bioglass (BG) and Zn-doped BG obtained by injection molding. The main outcome was the manufacture of bioactive, strong, and flexible filament sticks of the required length, diameter, and properties. Then, sticks were used for scaffold production. We investigated the effect of bioglass addition on the samples mechanical and biological properties. The samples were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy, optical microscopy, infrared spectroscopy, and microtomography. The effect of bioglass addition on changes in the SBF mineralization process and cell morphology was evaluated. The presence of a spatial microstructure within the scaffolds affects their mechanical properties by reducing them. The tensile strength of the scaffolds compared to filaments was lower by 58-61%. In vitro mineralization experiments showed that apatite formed on scaffolds modified with BG after 7 days of immersion in SBF. Scaffold with Zn-doped BG showed a retarded apatite formation. Innovative 3D-printing filaments containing bioglasses have been successfully applied to print bioactive scaffolds with the surface suitable for cell attachment and proliferation.

Citing Articles

Four-Dimensional Printing of β-Tricalcium Phosphate-Modified Shape Memory Polymers for Bone Scaffolds in Osteochondral Regeneration.

Rajzer I, Kurowska A, Janusz J, Maslanka M, Jablonski A, Szczygiel P Materials (Basel). 2025; 18(2).

PMID: 39859778 PMC: 11767229. DOI: 10.3390/ma18020306.


Assessment of Obesity as Risk Factor of Lumbar Disc Surgery: Retrospective Analysis of 598 Cases and Simulated Surgery on 3D-Printed Models.

Stroop R, Carballar F, Zawy Alsofy S, Sarkis H, Nakamura M, Greiner C J Clin Med. 2024; 13(14).

PMID: 39064233 PMC: 11278390. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13144193.


Materials Suitable for Osteochondral Regeneration.

Novotna R, Frankova J ACS Omega. 2024; 9(28):30097-30108.

PMID: 39035913 PMC: 11256084. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.4c04789.


Self-Assembled Hydrogel Membranes with Structurally Tunable Mechanical and Biological Properties.

Abdel-Rahman R, Abdel-Mohsen A, Frankova J, Piana F, Kalina L, Gajdosova V Biomacromolecules. 2024; 25(6):3449-3463.

PMID: 38739908 PMC: 11170955. DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.4c00082.

References
1.
Wang X, Molino B, Pitkanen S, Ojansivu M, Xu C, Hannula M . 3D Scaffolds of Polycaprolactone/Copper-Doped Bioactive Glass: Architecture Engineering with Additive Manufacturing and Cellular Assessments in a Coculture of Bone Marrow Stem Cells and Endothelial Cells. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2021; 5(9):4496-4510. DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00105. View

2.
Mehrabi T, Mesgar A, Mohammadi Z . Bioactive Glasses: A Promising Therapeutic Ion Release Strategy for Enhancing Wound Healing. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2020; 6(10):5399-5430. DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c00528. View

3.
Kokubo T, Takadama H . How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity?. Biomaterials. 2006; 27(15):2907-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.017. View

4.
Rajzer I, Strek P, Wiatr M, Skladzien J, Kurowska A, Kopec J . Biomaterials in the Reconstruction of Nasal Septum Perforation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2020; 130(7):731-737. DOI: 10.1177/0003489420970589. View

5.
Kargozar S, Baino F, Hamzehlou S, Hill R, Mozafari M . Bioactive glasses entering the mainstream. Drug Discov Today. 2018; 23(10):1700-1704. DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2018.05.027. View