» Articles » PMID: 36768047

Watershed Horizontal Ecological Compensation Policy and Green Ecological City Development: Spatial and Mechanism Assessment

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2023 Feb 11
PMID 36768047
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Green ecological development has become an inevitable choice to achieve sustainable urban development and carbon neutrality. This paper evaluates the level of green ecological city development in the Xin'an watershed as measured by green total factor productivity (), analyzes the direct and spatial effects of the Watershed Horizontal Ecological Compensation policy on , and further examines the moderating effect of the Research and Development () incentives, industrial structure, and income gap. This paper conducts difference-in-differences (DID) and spatial regression analysis on 27 cities from 2007 to 2019. The results show that progresses to varying degrees across cities over time, especially in the pilot cities. Crucially, the Watershed Horizontal Ecological Compensation policy significantly improved , although the effect was slight. Interestingly, the increase in in pilot cities that implemented the policy spatially suppressed the increase in in cities that did not implement the policy. Our evidence also shows that the positive effect of the policy is higher in regions with higher incentives and industrial structure upgrading, which indicates that incentives and industrial upgrading are crucial. In comparison, the income gap has not made the expected negative adjustment effect under the Chinese government's poverty alleviation policy. However, the positive policy effect is heterogeneous in the downstream and upstream pilot cities. The "forcing effect" of the policy on the downstream cities is more favorable than the "compensating effect" on the upstream cities. Therefore, policymakers should pay more attention to ensuring the effectiveness of the Watershed Horizontal Ecological Compensation policy in enhancing as a long-term strategy to guarantee the sustainability of green ecological development in Chinese cities.

Citing Articles

Horizontal ecological compensation and urban inclusive green growth: evidence from China.

Wang H, Li W, Xiao H, Wang D Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1415309.

PMID: 39403443 PMC: 11472857. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1415309.

References
1.
Nie X, Chen Z, Wang H, Jianxian Wu , Wu X, Lu B . Is the "pollution haven hypothesis" valid for China's carbon trading system? A re-examination based on inter-provincial carbon emission transfer. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022; 29(26):40110-40122. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-18737-7. View

2.
Zhao S, Cao Y, Feng C, Guo K, Zhang J . How do heterogeneous R&D investments affect China's green productivity: Revisiting the Porter hypothesis. Sci Total Environ. 2022; 825:154090. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154090. View

3.
Lin B, Zhou Y . Does energy efficiency make sense in China? Based on the perspective of economic growth quality. Sci Total Environ. 2021; 804:149895. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149895. View

4.
Lei Z, Huang L, Cai Y . Can environmental tax bring strong porter effect? Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022; 29(21):32246-32260. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-17119-9. View

5.
Ma N, Liu P, Xiao Y, Tang H, Zhang J . Can Green Technological Innovation Reduce Hazardous Air Pollutants?-An Empirical Test Based on 283 Cities in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(3). PMC: 8835187. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19031611. View