» Articles » PMID: 36767021

Positioning Technostress in the JD-R Model Perspective: A Systematic Literature Review

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2023 Feb 11
PMID 36767021
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This paper aims to describe the effects of Technostress on employees' well-being and productivity. We adopted the Job Demands Resources Model as a theoretical framework to analyze the "Technostress" phenomenon in order to clarify whether and how technology can be considered a job demand, a job resource, or part of the effects of personal resources in the workplace. The sources search and selection process was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines and regarded papers published from 2010 to 2022. Overall, the findings show that most selected papers consider ICT a job demand negatively affecting human behavior, thoughts, and attitudes. In contrast, some report that ICT acts as a job resource, thus reducing the impact of job demands and their physiological and psychological costs. Finally, a third category of studies does not consider the effects of ICT itself but gives more space to the interaction among ICT, the organizational context in which it is used, and the personal characteristics of ICT users. More specifically, the findings show how individual features and organizational procedures can shape the interpretations employees make about their ICT-related experiences at work and, consequently, their performance or well-being. Findings suggest that when ICT tools are strategically planned and used within organizations, they can enrich the employee experience at work, positively affecting the individual and the organizational level.

Citing Articles

Strengths use and thriving at work among nurses: a latent profile and mediation analysis.

Wu J, Shen Z, Ouyang Z, Xiang Y, Ding R, Liao Y BMC Nurs. 2025; 24(1):69.

PMID: 39833813 PMC: 11749353. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-025-02715-8.


Techno-strain and techno-insecurity are associated with poor mental well-being in specific age and occupation groups.

Yang H, Cheng Y, Liu Y, Cheng W J Occup Health. 2024; 67(1).

PMID: 39727332 PMC: 11827113. DOI: 10.1093/joccuh/uiae079.


Technology frustration in healthcare - does it matter in staff ratings of stress, emotional exhaustion, and satisfaction with care? A cross-sectional correlational study using the job demands-resources theory.

Wirkkala M, Wijk K, Larsson A, Engstrom M BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):1557.

PMID: 39643868 PMC: 11624589. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11906-z.


Challenges of modern work environments and means of overcoming them in the context of psychosocial risk assessments.

Pavlista V, Angerer P, Diebig M BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):3394.

PMID: 39639298 PMC: 11622553. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-20818-w.


Adapting to a New Normal: Peruvian University Faculty's Experiences with Techno-Stress Post-COVID-19.

Suyo-Vega J, Meneses-La-Riva M, Fernandez-Bedoya V F1000Res. 2024; 12:1381.

PMID: 39563994 PMC: 11574330. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.141432.3.


References
1.
Salanova M, Llorens S, Cifre E . The dark side of technologies: technostress among users of information and communication technologies. Int J Psychol. 2012; 48(3):422-36. DOI: 10.1080/00207594.2012.680460. View

2.
Tuan L . Employee mindfulness and proactive coping for technostress in the COVID-19 outbreak: The roles of regulatory foci, technostress, and job insecurity. Comput Human Behav. 2022; 129:107148. PMC: 8705475. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107148. View

3.
Ferrara B, Pansini M, De Vincenzi C, Buonomo I, Benevene P . Investigating the Role of Remote Working on Employees' Performance and Well-Being: An Evidence-Based Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(19). PMC: 9566387. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191912373. View

4.
Nijp H, Beckers D, Van De Voorde K, Geurts S, Kompier M . Effects of new ways of working on work hours and work location, health and job-related outcomes. Chronobiol Int. 2016; 33(6):604-18. DOI: 10.3109/07420528.2016.1167731. View

5.
Kaduk A, Genadek K, Kelly E, Moen P . Involuntary vs. Voluntary Flexible Work: Insights for Scholars and Stakeholders. Community Work Fam. 2022; 22(4):412-442. PMC: 9455838. DOI: 10.1080/13668803.2019.1616532. View