» Articles » PMID: 36763663

Testing, Explaining, and Exploring Models of Facial Expressions of Emotions

Overview
Journal Sci Adv
Specialties Biology
Science
Date 2023 Feb 10
PMID 36763663
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Models are the hallmark of mature scientific inquiry. In psychology, this maturity has been reached in a pervasive question-what models best represent facial expressions of emotion? Several hypotheses propose different combinations of facial movements [action units (AUs)] as best representing the six basic emotions and four conversational signals across cultures. We developed a new framework to formalize such hypotheses as predictive models, compare their ability to predict human emotion categorizations in Western and East Asian cultures, explain the causal role of individual AUs, and explore updated, culture-accented models that improve performance by reducing a prevalent Western bias. Our predictive models also provide a noise ceiling to inform the explanatory power and limitations of different factors (e.g., AUs and individual differences). Thus, our framework provides a new approach to test models of social signals, explain their predictive power, and explore their optimization, with direct implications for theory development.

Citing Articles

Expression perceptive fields explain individual differences in the recognition of facial emotions.

Murray T, Binetti N, Venkataramaiyer R, Namboodiri V, Cosker D, Viding E Commun Psychol. 2024; 2(1):62.

PMID: 39242751 PMC: 11332168. DOI: 10.1038/s44271-024-00111-7.


Advancements in brain-machine interfaces for application in the metaverse.

Liu Y, Liu R, Ge J, Wang Y Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1383319.

PMID: 38919909 PMC: 11198002. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1383319.


Naturalistic acute pain states decoded from neural and facial dynamics.

Huang Y, Gopal J, Kakusa B, Li A, Huang W, Wang J bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38766098 PMC: 11100805. DOI: 10.1101/2024.05.10.593652.


Cultural facial expressions dynamically convey emotion category and intensity information.

Chen C, Messinger D, Chen C, Yan H, Duan Y, Ince R Curr Biol. 2023; 34(1):213-223.e5.

PMID: 38141619 PMC: 10831323. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.12.001.

References
1.
Mehu M, Scherer K . Emotion categories and dimensions in the facial communication of affect: An integrated approach. Emotion. 2015; 15(6):798-811. DOI: 10.1037/a0039416. View

2.
Yarkoni T . The generalizability crisis. Behav Brain Sci. 2020; 45:e1. PMC: 10681374. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X20001685. View

3.
Said C, Sebe N, Todorov A . Structural resemblance to emotional expressions predicts evaluation of emotionally neutral faces. Emotion. 2009; 9(2):260-4. DOI: 10.1037/a0014681. View

4.
Cowen A, Keltner D . Self-report captures 27 distinct categories of emotion bridged by continuous gradients. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017; 114(38):E7900-E7909. PMC: 5617253. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1702247114. View

5.
Huis In t Veld E, van Boxtel G, de Gelder B . The Body Action Coding System II: muscle activations during the perception and expression of emotion. Front Behav Neurosci. 2014; 8:330. PMC: 4172051. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00330. View