» Articles » PMID: 36763171

Cell-free Circulating RAS Mutation Concentrations significantly Impact the Survival of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients

Abstract

Purpose: RAS mutations are predictors of an adverse outcome in EGFR-targeted therapies and have been proposed as prognostic biomarkers of survival in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The analysis of circulating tumor DNA from plasma samples, known as liquid biopsies, has indicated that the RAS mutation status may change over time, potentially affecting patients' prognosis. To further evaluate the clinical validity of RAS mutation retesting using liquid biopsies, we prospectively investigated the impact of the circulating quantitative RAS mutation status on the course of mCRC.

Methods: The present study included 81 consecutively recruited patients with mCRC. We used targeted next-generation sequencing of circulating cell-free DNA to determine and quantify plasma RAS mutation status.

Results: Patients with a RAS mutation detected by liquid biopsy (37%; n = 30) were at increased risk of death during the follow-up period compared to RAS wild-type patients. Patients with evidence of a RAS mutation in the primary tumor but a putative RAS mutation loss in plasma (28%; n = 11) showed a prolonged survival compared to patients with a preserved RAS mutation status. Also, circulating RAS mutation concentrations significantly affected the outcome: The mortality risk of patients with a high RAS mutation concentration increased fivefold compared to subjects with a putative RAS mutation loss or low RAS mutation concentration.

Conclusion: Our results emphasize the clinical value of circulating RAS mutations in managing mCRC.

Citing Articles

Putting comprehensive genomic profiling of ctDNA to work: 10 proposed use cases.

Desai A, Pasquina L, Nulsen C, Keller-Evans R, Mata D, Tukachinsky H J Liq Biopsy. 2025; 4:100140.

PMID: 40027147 PMC: 11863816. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlb.2024.100140.


ctDNA as a prognostic biomarker in resectable CLM: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wang D, Zhao P, Lu T, Ren J, Zhu L, Han X Open Life Sci. 2023; 18(1):20220615.

PMID: 37250841 PMC: 10224622. DOI: 10.1515/biol-2022-0615.

References
1.
Bartolacci C, Andreani C, El-Gammal Y, Scaglioni P . Lipid Metabolism Regulates Oxidative Stress and Ferroptosis in RAS-Driven Cancers: A Perspective on Cancer Progression and Therapy. Front Mol Biosci. 2021; 8:706650. PMC: 8415548. DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.706650. View

2.
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel R, Torre L, Jemal A . Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018; 68(6):394-424. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21492. View

3.
Callesen L, Hamfjord J, Boysen A, Pallisgaard N, Guren T, Kure E . Circulating tumour DNA and its clinical utility in predicting treatment response or survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Cancer. 2022; 127(3):500-513. PMC: 9345951. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-01816-4. View

4.
Campos-da-Paz M, Dorea J, Galdino A, Lacava Z, Santos M . Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) and Hepatic Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer: Update on Biomarker for Clinical and Biotechnological Approaches. Recent Pat Biotechnol. 2018; 12(4):269-279. DOI: 10.2174/1872208312666180731104244. View

5.
Chan J, Chow J, Ho C, Tsui T, Cho W . Clinical application of circulating tumor DNA in breast cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021; 147(5):1431-1442. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-021-03588-5. View