» Articles » PMID: 36761328

Mobile Health Solutions: An Opportunity for Rehabilitation in Low- and Middle Income Countries?

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2023 Feb 10
PMID 36761328
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mobile health (mHealth) development has advanced rapidly, indicating promise as an effective patient intervention. mHealth has many potential benefits that could help the treatment of patients, and the development of rehabilitation in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). mHealth is a low-cost option that does not need rapid access to healthcare clinics or employees. It increases the feasibility and rationality of clinical treatment expectations in comparison to the conventional clinical model of management by promoting patient adherence to the treatment plan. mHealth can also serve as a basis for formulating treatment plans and partially compensate for the shortcomings of the traditional model. In addition, mHealth can help achieve universal rehabilitation service coverage by overcoming geographical barriers, thereby increasing the number of ways patients can benefit from the rehabilitation service, and by providing rehabilitation to individuals in remote areas and communities with insufficient healthcare services. However, despite these positive potential aspects, there is currently only a very limited number of studies performed in LMICs using mHealth. In this study, we first reviewed the current evidence supporting the use of mHealth in rehabilitation to identify the countries where studies have been carried out. Then, we identify the current limitations of the implementation of such mHealth solutions and propose a 10-point action plan, focusing on the macro (e.g., policymakers), meso (e.g., technology and healthcare institutions), and micro (e.g., patients and relatives) levels to ease the use, validation, and implementation in LMICs and thus participate in the development and recognition of public health and rehabilitation in these countries.

Citing Articles

Unlocking the potential of serious games for rehabilitation in low and middle-income countries: addressing potential and current limitations.

Dereje D, Lamba D, Abessa T, Kenea C, Ramari C, Osama M Front Digit Health. 2025; 7:1505717.

PMID: 39957725 PMC: 11825514. DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1505717.


Effect of technology-supported mindfulness-based interventions for maternal depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis with implementation perspectives for resource-limited settings.

Worku B, Abdulahi M, Amenu D, Bonnechere B BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025; 25(1):155.

PMID: 39948517 PMC: 11827207. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-025-07286-9.


Mobile health interventions for active aging: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of physical activity promotion.

Daniels K, Quadflieg K, Bonnechere B Mhealth. 2025; 11:4.

PMID: 39944853 PMC: 11811652. DOI: 10.21037/mhealth-24-41.


The Impact of Lifestyle Intervention Programs on Long-Term Cardiac Event-Free Survival in Patients With Established Coronary Artery Disease.

Kanemitsu K, Hassan B, Mdivnishvili M, Abbas N Cureus. 2025; 16(12):e76585.

PMID: 39881913 PMC: 11774816. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.76585.


Exploring the Feasibility of a 5-Week mHealth Intervention to Enhance Physical Activity and an Active, Healthy Lifestyle in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Mixed Methods Study.

Daniels K, Vonck S, Robijns J, Quadflieg K, Bergs J, Spooren A JMIR Aging. 2025; 8:e63348.

PMID: 39869906 PMC: 11811674. DOI: 10.2196/63348.


References
1.
Cieza A, Causey K, Kamenov K, Wulf Hanson S, Chatterji S, Vos T . Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the Global Burden of Disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020; 396(10267):2006-2017. PMC: 7811204. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32340-0. View

2.
Warmerdam E, Hausdorff J, Atrsaei A, Zhou Y, Mirelman A, Aminian K . Long-term unsupervised mobility assessment in movement disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2020; 19(5):462-470. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30397-7. View

3.
Termoz A, Delvallee M, Damiolini E, Marchal M, Preau M, Huchon L . Co-design and evaluation of a patient-centred transition programme for stroke patients, combining case management and access to an internet information platform: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial - NAVISTROKE. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022; 22(1):537. PMC: 9027042. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07907-5. View

4.
Kraaijkamp J, van Dam van Isselt E, Persoon A, Versluis A, Chavannes N, Achterberg W . eHealth in Geriatric Rehabilitation: Systematic Review of Effectiveness, Feasibility, and Usability. J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23(8):e24015. PMC: 8414304. DOI: 10.2196/24015. View

5.
OBrien P, Kajja I, Potter J, OHara N, Kironde E, Petrisor B . Role of North-South Partnership in Trauma Management: Uganda Sustainable Trauma Orthopaedic Program. J Orthop Trauma. 2018; 32 Suppl 7:S21-S24. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001290. View