Two-year Outcomes of Leadless Vs. Transvenous Single-chamber Ventricular Pacemaker in High-risk Subgroups
Overview
Physiology
Authors
Affiliations
Aims: This study compares clinical outcomes between leadless pacemakers (leadless-VVI) and transvenous ventricular pacemakers (transvenous ventricular permanent-VVI) in subgroups of patients at higher risk of pacemaker complications.
Methods And Results: This study is based on the Micra Coverage with Evidence Development (CED) study. Patients from the Micra CED study were considered in a high-risk subgroup if they had a diagnosis of chronic kidney disease Stages 4-5 (CKD45), end-stage renal disease, malignancy, diabetes, tricuspid valve disease (TVD), or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) 12 months prior to pacemaker implant. A pre-specified set of complications and reinterventions were identified using diagnosis and procedure codes. Competing risks models were used to compare reinterventions and complications between leadless-VVI and transvenous-VVI patients within each subgroup; results were adjusted for multiple comparisons. A post hoc comparison of a composite outcome of reinterventions and device complications was conducted. Out of 27 991 patients, 9858 leadless-VVI and 12 157 transvenous-VVI patients have at least one high-risk comorbidity. Compared to transvenous-VVI patients, leadless-VVI patients in four subgroups [malignancy, HR 0.68 (0.48-0.95); diabetes, HR 0.69 (0.53-0.89); TVD, HR 0.60 (0.44-0.82); COPD, HR 0.73 (0.55-0.98)] had fewer complications, in three subgroups [diabetes, HR 0.58 (0.37-0.89); TVD, HR 0.46 (0.28-0.76); COPD, HR 0.51 (0.29-0.90)) had fewer reinterventions, and in four subgroups (malignancy, HR 0.52 (0.32-0.83); diabetes, HR 0.52 (0.35-0.77); TVD, HR 0.44 (0.28-0.70); COPD, HR 0.55 (0.34-0.89)] had lower rates of the combined outcome.
Conclusion: In a real-world study, leadless pacemaker patients had lower 2-year complications and reinterventions rates compared with transvenous-VVI pacing in several high-risk subgroups.
Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03039712.
Kansakar S, Naeem A, Moskovits N, Shrestha D, Shtembari J, Biswas M J Clin Med. 2025; 14(1.
PMID: 39797285 PMC: 11721035. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14010202.
Atrial Fibrillation and Cancer-Epidemiology, Mechanisms, and Management.
Davis N, Prasitlumkum N, Tan N J Clin Med. 2025; 13(24.
PMID: 39768676 PMC: 11677472. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13247753.
Yan L, Ling L, Song Y, Jiang T Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2024; 14(5):878-889.
PMID: 39513134 PMC: 11538831. DOI: 10.21037/cdt-24-181.
Two-year outcomes of Micra AV leadless pacemakers in the Micra AV CED study.
El-Chami M, Higuera L, Longacre C, Stromberg K, Crossley G, Piccini J Europace. 2024; 26(11).
PMID: 39485833 PMC: 11558452. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae273.
Transcatheter non-acute retrieval of the tine-based leadless ventricular pacemaker.
Funasako M, Hala P, Janotka M, Sorf J, Machova L, Petru J Europace. 2024; 26(10).
PMID: 39374848 PMC: 11503947. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae256.