» Articles » PMID: 36757859

Two-year Outcomes of Leadless Vs. Transvenous Single-chamber Ventricular Pacemaker in High-risk Subgroups

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: This study compares clinical outcomes between leadless pacemakers (leadless-VVI) and transvenous ventricular pacemakers (transvenous ventricular permanent-VVI) in subgroups of patients at higher risk of pacemaker complications.

Methods And Results: This study is based on the Micra Coverage with Evidence Development (CED) study. Patients from the Micra CED study were considered in a high-risk subgroup if they had a diagnosis of chronic kidney disease Stages 4-5 (CKD45), end-stage renal disease, malignancy, diabetes, tricuspid valve disease (TVD), or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) 12 months prior to pacemaker implant. A pre-specified set of complications and reinterventions were identified using diagnosis and procedure codes. Competing risks models were used to compare reinterventions and complications between leadless-VVI and transvenous-VVI patients within each subgroup; results were adjusted for multiple comparisons. A post hoc comparison of a composite outcome of reinterventions and device complications was conducted. Out of 27 991 patients, 9858 leadless-VVI and 12 157 transvenous-VVI patients have at least one high-risk comorbidity. Compared to transvenous-VVI patients, leadless-VVI patients in four subgroups [malignancy, HR 0.68 (0.48-0.95); diabetes, HR 0.69 (0.53-0.89); TVD, HR 0.60 (0.44-0.82); COPD, HR 0.73 (0.55-0.98)] had fewer complications, in three subgroups [diabetes, HR 0.58 (0.37-0.89); TVD, HR 0.46 (0.28-0.76); COPD, HR 0.51 (0.29-0.90)) had fewer reinterventions, and in four subgroups (malignancy, HR 0.52 (0.32-0.83); diabetes, HR 0.52 (0.35-0.77); TVD, HR 0.44 (0.28-0.70); COPD, HR 0.55 (0.34-0.89)] had lower rates of the combined outcome.

Conclusion: In a real-world study, leadless pacemaker patients had lower 2-year complications and reinterventions rates compared with transvenous-VVI pacing in several high-risk subgroups.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03039712.

Citing Articles

Leadless Pacemaker vs. Transvenous Pacemaker in End Stage Kidney Disease: Insights from the Nationwide Readmission Database.

Kansakar S, Naeem A, Moskovits N, Shrestha D, Shtembari J, Biswas M J Clin Med. 2025; 14(1.

PMID: 39797285 PMC: 11721035. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14010202.


Atrial Fibrillation and Cancer-Epidemiology, Mechanisms, and Management.

Davis N, Prasitlumkum N, Tan N J Clin Med. 2025; 13(24.

PMID: 39768676 PMC: 11677472. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13247753.


Efficacy and safety of leadless ventricular pacemaker: a single-center retrospective observational study.

Yan L, Ling L, Song Y, Jiang T Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2024; 14(5):878-889.

PMID: 39513134 PMC: 11538831. DOI: 10.21037/cdt-24-181.


Two-year outcomes of Micra AV leadless pacemakers in the Micra AV CED study.

El-Chami M, Higuera L, Longacre C, Stromberg K, Crossley G, Piccini J Europace. 2024; 26(11).

PMID: 39485833 PMC: 11558452. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae273.


Transcatheter non-acute retrieval of the tine-based leadless ventricular pacemaker.

Funasako M, Hala P, Janotka M, Sorf J, Machova L, Petru J Europace. 2024; 26(10).

PMID: 39374848 PMC: 11503947. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae256.


References
1.
El-Chami M, Clementy N, Garweg C, Omar R, Duray G, Gornick C . Leadless Pacemaker Implantation in Hemodialysis Patients: Experience With the Micra Transcatheter Pacemaker. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019; 5(2):162-170. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.12.008. View

2.
Palmisano P, Facchin D, Ziacchi M, Nigro G, Nicosia A, Bongiorni M . Rate and nature of complications with leadless transcatheter pacemakers compared with transvenous pacemakers: results from an Italian multicentre large population analysis. Europace. 2022; 25(1):112-120. PMC: 10103553. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euac112. View

3.
Garg A, Koneru J, Fagan D, Stromberg K, Padala S, El-Chami M . Morbidity and mortality in patients precluded for transvenous pacemaker implantation: Experience with a leadless pacemaker. Heart Rhythm. 2020; 17(12):2056-2063. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.07.035. View

4.
Wicke F, Glushan A, Schubert I, Koster I, Lubeck R, Hammer M . Performance of the adapted Diabetes Complications Severity Index translated to ICD-10. Am J Manag Care. 2019; 25(2):e45-e49. View

5.
El-Chami M, Bockstedt L, Longacre C, Higuera L, Stromberg K, Crossley G . Leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacing in the Micra CED study: 2-year follow-up. Eur Heart J. 2021; 43(12):1207-1215. PMC: 8934700. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab767. View