» Articles » PMID: 36755171

Operando Studies Reveal Active Cu Nanograins for CO Electroreduction

Abstract

Carbon dioxide electroreduction facilitates the sustainable synthesis of fuels and chemicals. Although Cu enables CO-to-multicarbon product (C) conversion, the nature of the active sites under operating conditions remains elusive. Importantly, identifying active sites of high-performance Cu nanocatalysts necessitates nanoscale, time-resolved operando techniques. Here, we present a comprehensive investigation of the structural dynamics during the life cycle of Cu nanocatalysts. A 7 nm Cu nanoparticle ensemble evolves into metallic Cu nanograins during electrolysis before complete oxidation to single-crystal CuO nanocubes following post-electrolysis air exposure. Operando analytical and four-dimensional electrochemical liquid-cell scanning transmission electron microscopy shows the presence of metallic Cu nanograins under CO reduction conditions. Correlated high-energy-resolution time-resolved X-ray spectroscopy suggests that metallic Cu, rich in nanograin boundaries, supports undercoordinated active sites for C-C coupling. Quantitative structure-activity correlation shows that a higher fraction of metallic Cu nanograins leads to higher C selectivity. A 7 nm Cu nanoparticle ensemble, with a unity fraction of active Cu nanograins, exhibits sixfold higher C selectivity than the 18 nm counterpart with one-third of active Cu nanograins. The correlation of multimodal operando techniques serves as a powerful platform to advance our fundamental understanding of the complex structural evolution of nanocatalysts under electrochemical conditions.

Citing Articles

Sulfur-doping tunes p-d orbital coupling over asymmetric Zn-Sn dual-atom for boosting CO electroreduction to formate.

Peng B, She H, Wei Z, Sun Z, Deng Z, Sun Z Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):2217.

PMID: 40044667 PMC: 11882884. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-57573-4.


Decoupling CO effects from electrochemistry: A mechanistic study of copper catalyst degradation.

Serra-Maia R, Varley J, Weitzner S, Yu H, Shi R, Biener J iScience. 2025; 28(3):111851.

PMID: 40040807 PMC: 11879610. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.111851.


Planar chlorination engineering induced symmetry-broken single-atom site catalyst for enhanced CO electroreduction.

Wei S, Zhu J, Chen X, Yang R, Gu K, Li L Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):1652.

PMID: 39952945 PMC: 11829013. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-56271-5.


/ study of Cu-based nanocatalysts for CO electroreduction using electrochemical liquid cell TEM.

Wan J, Zhang Q, Liu E, Chen Y, Zheng J, Ren A Front Chem. 2025; 13:1525245.

PMID: 39950133 PMC: 11821932. DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2025.1525245.


Transient pulsed discharge preparation of graphene aerogel supports asymmetric Cu cluster catalysts promote CO electroreduction.

Liu K, Shen H, Sun Z, Zhou Q, Liu G, Sun Z Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):1203.

PMID: 39885168 PMC: 11782518. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-56534-1.


References
1.
Mefford J, Akbashev A, Kang M, Bentley C, Gent W, Deng H . Correlative operando microscopy of oxygen evolution electrocatalysts. Nature. 2021; 593(7857):67-73. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03454-x. View

2.
Vavra J, Shen T, Stoian D, Tileli V, Buonsanti R . Real-time Monitoring Reveals Dissolution/Redeposition Mechanism in Copper Nanocatalysts during the Initial Stages of the CO Reduction Reaction. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2020; 60(3):1347-1354. DOI: 10.1002/anie.202011137. View

3.
Hahn C, Hatsukade T, Kim Y, Vailionis A, Baricuatro J, Higgins D . Engineering Cu surfaces for the electrocatalytic conversion of CO: Controlling selectivity toward oxygenates and hydrocarbons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017; 114(23):5918-5923. PMC: 5468660. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1618935114. View

4.
Li C, Ciston J, Kanan M . Electroreduction of carbon monoxide to liquid fuel on oxide-derived nanocrystalline copper. Nature. 2014; 508(7497):504-7. DOI: 10.1038/nature13249. View

5.
Eilert A, Cavalca F, Roberts F, Osterwalder J, Liu C, Favaro M . Subsurface Oxygen in Oxide-Derived Copper Electrocatalysts for Carbon Dioxide Reduction. J Phys Chem Lett. 2016; 8(1):285-290. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b02273. View