Dissecting Cell Identity Via Network Inference and in Silico Gene Perturbation

Overview

Journal Nature

Specialty Science

Date 2023 Feb 9

PMID 36755098

Authors

Kenji Kamimoto

Blerta Stringa

Christy M Hoffmann

Kunal Jindal

Lilianna Solnica-Krezel

Samantha A Morris

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Cell identity is governed by the complex regulation of gene expression, represented as gene-regulatory networks. Here we use gene-regulatory networks inferred from single-cell multi-omics data to perform in silico transcription factor perturbations, simulating the consequent changes in cell identity using only unperturbed wild-type data. We apply this machine-learning-based approach, CellOracle, to well-established paradigms-mouse and human haematopoiesis, and zebrafish embryogenesis-and we correctly model reported changes in phenotype that occur as a result of transcription factor perturbation. Through systematic in silico transcription factor perturbation in the developing zebrafish, we simulate and experimentally validate a previously unreported phenotype that results from the loss of noto, an established notochord regulator. Furthermore, we identify an axial mesoderm regulator, lhx1a. Together, these results show that CellOracle can be used to analyse the regulation of cell identity by transcription factors, and can provide mechanistic insights into development and differentiation.

Citing Articles

A large-scale benchmark for network inference from single-cell perturbation data.

Chevalley M, Roohani Y, Mehrjou A, Leskovec J, Schwab P Commun Biol. 2025; 8(1):412.

PMID: 40069299 PMC: 11897147. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-07764-y.

Single-nucleus analysis of thoracic perivascular adipose tissue reveals critical changes in cell composition, communication, and gene regulatory networks induced by a high fat hypertensive diet.

Terrian L, Thompson J, Bowman D, Panda V, Contreras G, Rockwell C bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39990347 PMC: 11844537. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.13.636878.

Multiomics Research: Principles and Challenges in Integrated Analysis.

Luo Y, Zhao C, Chen F Biodes Res. 2025; 6:0059.

PMID: 39990095 PMC: 11844812. DOI: 10.34133/bdr.0059.

Unveiling the cell-type-specific landscape of cellular senescence through single-cell transcriptomics using SenePy.

Sanborn M, Wang X, Gao S, Dai Y, Rehman J Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):1884.

PMID: 39987255 PMC: 11846890. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-57047-7.

YY1 mutations disrupt corticogenesis through a cell type specific rewiring of cell-autonomous and non-cell-autonomous transcriptional programs.

Pereira M, Finazzi V, Rizzuti L, Aprile D, Aiello V, Mollica L Mol Psychiatry. 2025; .

PMID: 39987231 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-025-02929-x.

References

Davidson E, Erwin D . Gene regulatory networks and the evolution of animal body plans. Science. 2006; 311(5762):796-800. DOI: 10.1126/science.1113832. View

Adamson B, Norman T, Jost M, Cho M, Nunez J, Chen Y . A Multiplexed Single-Cell CRISPR Screening Platform Enables Systematic Dissection of the Unfolded Protein Response. Cell. 2016; 167(7):1867-1882.e21. PMC: 5315571. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.048. View

Dixit A, Parnas O, Li B, Chen J, Fulco C, Jerby-Arnon L . Perturb-Seq: Dissecting Molecular Circuits with Scalable Single-Cell RNA Profiling of Pooled Genetic Screens. Cell. 2016; 167(7):1853-1866.e17. PMC: 5181115. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.038. View

Datlinger P, Rendeiro A, Schmidl C, Krausgruber T, Traxler P, Klughammer J . Pooled CRISPR screening with single-cell transcriptome readout. Nat Methods. 2017; 14(3):297-301. PMC: 5334791. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.4177. View

Ji Y, Lotfollahi M, Wolf F, Theis F . Machine learning for perturbational single-cell omics. Cell Syst. 2021; 12(6):522-537. DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2021.05.016. View

Fiers M, Minnoye L, Aibar S, Gonzalez-Blas C, Atak Z, Aerts S . Mapping gene regulatory networks from single-cell omics data. Brief Funct Genomics. 2018; 17(4):246-254. PMC: 6063279. DOI: 10.1093/bfgp/elx046. View

Aibar S, Gonzalez-Blas C, Moerman T, Huynh-Thu V, Imrichova H, Hulselmans G . SCENIC: single-cell regulatory network inference and clustering. Nat Methods. 2017; 14(11):1083-1086. PMC: 5937676. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.4463. View

Iacono G, Massoni-Badosa R, Heyn H . Single-cell transcriptomics unveils gene regulatory network plasticity. Genome Biol. 2019; 20(1):110. PMC: 6547541. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-019-1713-4. View

Kartha V, Duarte F, Hu Y, Ma S, Chew J, Lareau C . Functional inference of gene regulation using single-cell multi-omics. Cell Genom. 2022; 2(9). PMC: 9534481. DOI: 10.1016/j.xgen.2022.100166. View

10.

Pliner H, Packer J, McFaline-Figueroa J, Cusanovich D, Daza R, Aghamirzaie D . Cicero Predicts cis-Regulatory DNA Interactions from Single-Cell Chromatin Accessibility Data. Mol Cell. 2018; 71(5):858-871.e8. PMC: 6582963. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.06.044. View

11.

Cusanovich D, Hill A, Aghamirzaie D, Daza R, Pliner H, Berletch J . A Single-Cell Atlas of In Vivo Mammalian Chromatin Accessibility. Cell. 2018; 174(5):1309-1324.e18. PMC: 6158300. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.052. View

12.

Oki S, Ohta T, Shioi G, Hatanaka H, Ogasawara O, Okuda Y . ChIP-Atlas: a data-mining suite powered by full integration of public ChIP-seq data. EMBO Rep. 2018; 19(12). PMC: 6280645. DOI: 10.15252/embr.201846255. View

13.

Orkin S, Zon L . Hematopoiesis: an evolving paradigm for stem cell biology. Cell. 2008; 132(4):631-44. PMC: 2628169. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.025. View

14.

Paul F, Arkin Y, Giladi A, Jaitin D, Kenigsberg E, Keren-Shaul H . Transcriptional Heterogeneity and Lineage Commitment in Myeloid Progenitors. Cell. 2015; 163(7):1663-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.013. View

15.

Rekhtman N, Radparvar F, Evans T, SKOULTCHI A . Direct interaction of hematopoietic transcription factors PU.1 and GATA-1: functional antagonism in erythroid cells. Genes Dev. 1999; 13(11):1398-411. PMC: 316770. DOI: 10.1101/gad.13.11.1398. View

16.

Zhang P, Behre G, Pan J, Iwama A, Wara-Aswapati N, Radomska H . Negative cross-talk between hematopoietic regulators: GATA proteins repress PU.1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96(15):8705-10. PMC: 17580. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.15.8705. View

17.

Nutt S, Metcalf D, DAmico A, Polli M, Wu L . Dynamic regulation of PU.1 expression in multipotent hematopoietic progenitors. J Exp Med. 2005; 201(2):221-31. PMC: 2212785. DOI: 10.1084/jem.20041535. View

18.

Back J, Allman D, Chan S, Kastner P . Visualizing PU.1 activity during hematopoiesis. Exp Hematol. 2005; 33(4):395-402. DOI: 10.1016/j.exphem.2004.12.010. View

19.

Fujiwara Y, Browne C, Cunniff K, Goff S, Orkin S . Arrested development of embryonic red cell precursors in mouse embryos lacking transcription factor GATA-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996; 93(22):12355-8. PMC: 37995. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.93.22.12355. View

20.

Yu C, Cantor A, Yang H, Browne C, Wells R, Fujiwara Y . Targeted deletion of a high-affinity GATA-binding site in the GATA-1 promoter leads to selective loss of the eosinophil lineage in vivo. J Exp Med. 2002; 195(11):1387-95. PMC: 2193547. DOI: 10.1084/jem.20020656. View