» Articles » PMID: 36743136

A Trend of Medical Negligence in Laser Therapy in the Capital City: A Nine-Year Survey

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to investigate the common causes of injuries, claims, and decisions related to laser therapy medical malpractice during a nine-year survey. The legal documents in the Coroner's Office of Forensic Medicine were investigated in a national database from 2012 to 2020 in Tehran, Iran. The frequency and nature of the cases, including the year of litigation, the location and certificate of the provider, the injury sustained, and the cause of legal action and judgment were collected. Three hundred and eighty-three cases related to injury from laser therapy were registered in the coroner's Office of Forensic Medicine during the study period. The incidence of litigation related to laser surgery showed an increasing trend, with a peak occurrence in 2020. Laser hair removal was the most common (51.2%) litigated procedure. General practice operators (48%) recorded the highest rate of laser-related medical complaints. Lack of skill was the most common reason for failure. Among 383 cases with public decisions, 62.4% of them were fault liability in paid judgment. Medical claims related to laser application are increasing. However, as it is clear, the growth of laser technology and the increasing demand for lasers in medical science require more surveillance to avoid probable injuries and improve patient safety, especially surveillance of the physicians who work outside the scope of their specialty.

Citing Articles

Insights From the Supreme Court Decisions: Undesirable Consequences After Minimally Invasive Cosmetic Interventions in Türkiye.

Yildirim M, Koc Yildirim S J Cosmet Dermatol. 2024; 24(1):e16588.

PMID: 39300955 PMC: 11743143. DOI: 10.1111/jocd.16588.

References
1.
van Dael J, Reader T, Gillespie A, Neves A, Darzi A, Mayer E . Learning from complaints in healthcare: a realist review of academic literature, policy evidence and front-line insights. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020; 29(8):684-695. PMC: 7398301. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009704. View

2.
Ong S, Coulson I . Legal claims in English dermatological practice. Br J Dermatol. 2010; 164(1):217-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.10047.x. View

3.
Goldberg D . Legal issues in laser operation. Clin Dermatol. 2006; 24(1):56-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2005.10.021. View

4.
Sugar A, Rapuano C, Culbertson W, Huang D, Varley G, Agapitos P . Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and astigmatism: safety and efficacy: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2002; 109(1):175-87. DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(01)00966-6. View

5.
Raeissi P, Taheri Mirghaed M, Sepehrian R, Afshari M, Rajabi M . Medical malpractice in Iran: A systematic review. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020; 33:110. PMC: 6946923. DOI: 10.34171/mjiri.33.110. View