» Articles » PMID: 36742112

Evaluating Patients' Choice of General and Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean Section and Associated Factors: a Descriptive Study

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2023 Feb 6
PMID 36742112
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Methods: In this descriptive study, pregnant women who had the ability to undergo both spinal and general anesthesia were referred to public and private hospitals in (Sari Imam Khomeini Hospital, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences). A questionnaire recorded the patient's demographic data, education and occupation, history of anesthesia, choice of anesthetic method, and reason for selection.

Results: A total of 384 women were included in the study, of whom 60% selected general anesthesia and 40% selected spinal anesthesia. Among the reasons for not choosing spinal anesthesia, most common were fear of injury to the spinal cord (64.3%) and fear of seeing and hearing during the surgery (53.3%), and among the reasons for not choosing general anesthesia, most common were fear of not waking (54.3%) and a desire to be alert at the time of infant birth (40.7%). Most of the women with a history of spinal anesthesia selected spinal anesthesia (53%), and 62% of those without a history of spinal anesthesia selected general anesthesia. Factors such as age, nonmedical staff advice, and being employed were significantly correlated with the choice of anesthesia (<0.005).

Conclusion: The rate of general anesthesia selection was higher than spinal anesthesia. More attention and efforts are required to educate patients regarding the method of anesthesia prior to the surgery.

Citing Articles

The evaluation of risk factors in fascia dehiscence after abdominal surgeries.

Parsa H, Haji Maghsoudi L, Mohammadzadeh A, Hosseini M Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024; 86(9):4984-4989.

PMID: 39239048 PMC: 11374210. DOI: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002335.


Effects on ondansetron of postdural puncture headache after cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.

Baharvand F, Vahabi S, Beiranvand S Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024; 86(6):3385-3390.

PMID: 38846852 PMC: 11152813. DOI: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002081.


The Prevalence of Acceptance Between General Anesthesia and Spinal Anesthesia Among Pregnant Women Undergoing Elective Caesarean Sections in Saudi Arabia.

Tawfeeq N, Hilal F, Alharbi N, Alowid F, Almaghrabi R, Alsubhi R Cureus. 2023; 15(9):e44972.

PMID: 37822429 PMC: 10563372. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.44972.

References
1.
Maheshwari D, Ismail S . Preoperative anxiety in patients selecting either general or regional anesthesia for elective cesarean section. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2015; 31(2):196-200. PMC: 4411833. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9185.155148. View

2.
Al-Husban N, Elmuhtaseb M, Al-Husban H, Nabhan M, Abuhalaweh H, Alkhatib Y . Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Retrospective Comparative Study. Int J Womens Health. 2021; 13:141-152. PMC: 7866905. DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S292434. View

3.
James A, Jamison M, Brancazio L, Myers E . Venous thromboembolism during pregnancy and the postpartum period: incidence, risk factors, and mortality. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 194(5):1311-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.11.008. View

4.
Sumikura H, Niwa H, Sato M, Nakamoto T, Asai T, Hagihira S . Rethinking general anesthesia for cesarean section. J Anesth. 2015; 30(2):268-73. DOI: 10.1007/s00540-015-2099-4. View

5.
Bukar M, Kwari D, Moruppa J, Ndonya D . Anaesthesia for caesarean delivery: choice of technique among antenatal attendees in North-eastern Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010; 30(8):822-5. DOI: 10.3109/01443615.2010.513459. View