» Articles » PMID: 36737094

Sodium Channel-inhibiting Drugs and Cancer-specific Survival: a Population-based Study of Electronic Primary Care Data

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2023 Feb 3
PMID 36737094
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Antiepileptic and antiarrhythmic drugs inhibit voltage-gated sodium (Na) channels (VGSCs), and preclinical studies show that these medications reduce tumour growth, invasion and metastasis. We investigated the association between VGSC inhibitor use and survival in patients with breast, bowel and prostate cancer.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Individual electronic primary healthcare records extracted from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink.

Participants: Records for 132 996 patients with a diagnosis of breast, bowel or prostate cancer.

Outcome Measures: Adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression was used to analyse cancer-specific survival associated with exposure to VGSC inhibitors. Exposure to non-VGSC-inhibiting antiepileptic medication and other non-VGSC blockers were also considered. Drug exposure was treated as a time-varying covariate to account for immortal time bias.

Results: During 1 002 225 person-years of follow-up, there were 42 037 cancer-specific deaths. 53 724 (40.4%) patients with cancer had at least one prescription for a VGSC inhibitor of interest. Increased risk of cancer-specific mortality was associated with exposure to this group of drugs (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.56 to 1.63, p<0.001). This applied to VGSC-inhibiting tricyclic antidepressants (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.50 to 1.65, p<0.001), local anaesthetics (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.43 to 1.55, p<0.001) and anticonvulsants (HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.34 to 1.48, p<0.001) and persisted in sensitivity analyses. In contrast, exposure to VGSC-inhibiting class 1c and 1d antiarrhythmics was associated with significantly improved cancer-specific survival (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.88, p<0.001 and HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.88, p=0.01, respectively).

Conclusions: Association between VGSC inhibitor use and mortality in patients with cancer varies according to indication. Exposure to VGSC-inhibiting antiarrhythmics, but not anticonvulsants, supports findings from preclinical data, with improved survival. However, additional confounding factors may underlie these associations, highlighting the need for further study.

Citing Articles

Voltage-gated sodium channels in cancers.

Liu H, Weng J, Huang C, Jackson A Biomark Res. 2024; 12(1):70.

PMID: 39060933 PMC: 11282680. DOI: 10.1186/s40364-024-00620-x.


A novel Na1.5-dependent feedback mechanism driving glycolytic acidification in breast cancer metastasis.

Leslie T, Tripp A, James A, Fraser S, Nelson M, Sajjaboontawee N Oncogene. 2024; 43(34):2578-2594.

PMID: 39048659 PMC: 11329375. DOI: 10.1038/s41388-024-03098-x.


Therapeutic targeting of voltage-gated sodium channel Na1.7 for cancer metastasis.

Pukkanasut P, Jaskula-Sztul R, Gomora J, Velu S Front Pharmacol. 2024; 15:1416705.

PMID: 39045054 PMC: 11263763. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1416705.


Electrical excitability of cancer cells-CELEX model updated.

Djamgoz M Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2024; 43(4):1579-1591.

PMID: 38976181 PMC: 11554705. DOI: 10.1007/s10555-024-10195-6.


Repositioning of antiarrhythmics for prostate cancer treatment: a novel strategy to reprogram cancer-associated fibroblasts towards a tumor-suppressive phenotype.

Doldi V, Tortoreto M, Colecchia M, Maffezzini M, Percio S, Giammello F J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2024; 43(1):161.

PMID: 38858661 PMC: 11165820. DOI: 10.1186/s13046-024-03081-0.


References
1.
Mantegazza M, Curia G, Biagini G, Ragsdale D, Avoli M . Voltage-gated sodium channels as therapeutic targets in epilepsy and other neurological disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2010; 9(4):413-24. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70059-4. View

2.
Driffort V, Gillet L, Bon E, Marionneau-Lambot S, Oullier T, Joulin V . Ranolazine inhibits NaV1.5-mediated breast cancer cell invasiveness and lung colonization. Mol Cancer. 2014; 13:264. PMC: 4295566. DOI: 10.1186/1476-4598-13-264. View

3.
Exadaktylos A, Buggy D, Moriarty D, Mascha E, Sessler D . Can anesthetic technique for primary breast cancer surgery affect recurrence or metastasis?. Anesthesiology. 2006; 105(4):660-4. PMC: 1615712. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200610000-00008. View

4.
Nevalainen O, Raitanen J, Ansakorpi H, Artama M, Isojarvi J, Auvinen A . Long-term mortality risk by cause of death in newly diagnosed patients with epilepsy in Finland: a nationwide register-based study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2013; 28(12):981-90. DOI: 10.1007/s10654-013-9848-1. View

5.
Fairhurst C, Watt I, Martin F, Bland M, Brackenbury W . Exposure to sodium channel-inhibiting drugs and cancer survival: protocol for a cohort study using the QResearch primary care database. BMJ Open. 2014; 4(11):e006604. PMC: 4244419. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006604. View