» Articles » PMID: 36729189

Virtual Monochromatic Spectral CT Imaging in Preoperative Evaluations for Intraductal Spread of Breast Cancer: Comparison with Conventional CT and MRI

Overview
Journal Jpn J Radiol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Radiology
Date 2023 Feb 2
PMID 36729189
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the efficacy of virtual monochromatic spectral computed tomography imaging (VMI) in the preoperative evaluation for intraductal spread of breast cancer.

Materials And Methods: Twenty-four women who underwent spectral CT and were pathologically diagnosed with ductal carcinoma with a ≥ 2-cm noninvasive component were retrospectively enrolled in Group 1. Twenty-two women with 22 lesions pathologically diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ or microinvasive carcinoma were enrolled in Group 2. We compared the contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of the lesions on conventional 120-kVp CT images and 40-keV VMIs in Group 1. Two board-certified radiologists measured the maximum diameters of enhancing areas on 120-kVp CT, 40-keV VMI, and MRI in Group 2 and compared with histopathological sizes.

Results: The quantitative assessment of Group 1 revealed that the mean ± SD of the CNRs in the 40-keV images were significantly greater than those in the 120-kVp images (5.5 ± 1.9 vs. 3.6 ± 1.5, p < 0.0001). The quantitative assessment of Group 2 demonstrated that the lesion size observed in the conventional 120-kVp CT images by both readers was significantly underestimated as compared to the histopathological size (p = 0.017, 0.048), whereas both readers identified no significant differences between the lesion size measured on 40-keV VMI and the histopathological data. In a comparison with MRI, 40-keV VMI provided measurement within a 10-mm error range in more lesions as compared to the conventional 120-kVp CT.

Conclusion: VMI improves the evaluation of intraductal spread and is useful for the preoperative evaluations of breast cancer.

References
1.
Kataoka M, Honda M, Ohashi A, Yamaguchi K, Mori N, Goto M . Ultrafast Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI of the Breast: How Is It Used?. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2022; 21(1):83-94. PMC: 9199976. DOI: 10.2463/mrms.rev.2021-0157. View

2.
Hata T, Takahashi H, Watanabe K, Takahashi M, Taguchi K, Itoh T . Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: a comparative study with mammography and ultrasonography. J Am Coll Surg. 2004; 198(2):190-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.10.008. View

3.
Uematsu T, Yuen S, Kasami M, Uchida Y . Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging, multidetector row computed tomography, ultrasonography, and mammography for tumor extension of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008; 112(3):461-74. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-008-9890-y. View

4.
Siegler P, Holloway C, Causer P, Thevathasan G, Plewes D . Supine breast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011; 34(5):1212-7. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22605. View

5.
Okada K, Matsuda M, Tsuda T, Kido T, Murata A, Nishiyama H . Dual-energy computed tomography for evaluation of breast cancer: value of virtual monoenergetic images reconstructed with a noise-reduced monoenergetic reconstruction algorithm. Jpn J Radiol. 2019; 38(2):154-164. DOI: 10.1007/s11604-019-00897-1. View