» Articles » PMID: 36726353

The Efficacy and Safety of Lebrikizumab Monotherapy for the Management of Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2023 Feb 2
PMID 36726353
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronically relapsing disease. Few biologics are approved for moderate-to-severe AD, and novel interventions are emerging. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of lebrikizumab, an IL-13 immunomodulator, as monotherapy vs. placebo in treating moderate-to-severe AD.

Methods: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Medline, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov registry (CT.gov) databases were systematically searched. We evaluated lebrikizumab vs. placebo and measured efficacy using Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Body Surface Area (BSA), and Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) change from baseline to week 16. Safety was evaluated by the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs), non-serious adverse events (NSAEs), and mortality. The risk of bias was investigated using the Revised Cochrane risk of bias tool.

Results: Three RCTs ( = 1,149) included 543 (47.25%) men vs. 606 (52.75%) women. Meta-analysis showed statistically significant improvement in EASI, IGA, and BSA. EASI75 at week 16 for all regimens was (RR = 2.62, 95% CI [2.06, 3.34], < 0.00001) with the first regimen (500 mg loading dose then 200 mg every 2 weeks) showing the most significant improvement (RR = 3.02, 95% CI [2.39, 3.82], < 0.00001). The pooled analysis of safety outcomes concluded that lebrikizumab did not correlate significantly with the incidence of SAEs, NSAEs, and mortality.

Conclusion: Overall, lebrikizumab showed a significant improvement in all efficacy outcomes. Additionally, it did not contribute to any significant incidence of SAEs, NSAEs, or mortality. The risk of bias in included RCTs was minor except in the randomization domain. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) assessment of the outcomes ranged from low to high, but predominantly high certainty of evidence.

Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022362438.

Citing Articles

Efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lin J, Luo M, Zhuo Q, Chen N, Zhang H, Han Y Front Pharmacol. 2024; 15:1429709.

PMID: 39629076 PMC: 11611541. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1429709.

References
1.
Spergel J, Boguniewicz M, Paller A, Hebert A, Gallagher P, McCormick C . Addition of topical pimecrolimus to once-daily mid-potent steroid confers no short-term therapeutic benefit in the treatment of severe atopic dermatitis; a randomized controlled trial. Br J Dermatol. 2007; 157(2):378-81. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.08001.x. View

2.
Lassus A . Clinical comparison of alclometasone dipropionate cream 0.05% with hydrocortisone butyrate cream 0.1% in the treatment of atopic dermatitis in children. J Int Med Res. 1983; 11(5):315-9. DOI: 10.1177/030006058301100512. View

3.
Perche P, Cook M, Feldman S . Abrocitinib: A New FDA-Approved Drug for Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis. Ann Pharmacother. 2022; 57(1):86-98. DOI: 10.1177/10600280221096713. View

4.
Breuer K, Werfel T, Kapp A . Safety and efficacy of topical calcineurin inhibitors in the treatment of childhood atopic dermatitis. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2005; 6(2):65-77. DOI: 10.2165/00128071-200506020-00001. View

5.
Carlsten C, Dimich-Ward H, Ferguson A, Watson W, Rousseau R, Dybuncio A . Atopic dermatitis in a high-risk cohort: natural history, associated allergic outcomes, and risk factors. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2012; 110(1):24-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2012.10.005. View