» Articles » PMID: 36723723

Practice Pattern Variability in the Management of Regional Lymph Node Metastasis in Extremity and Trunk Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Survey of the Society of Surgical Oncology and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Membership

Abstract

Background: Regional lymph node metastasis in extremity and trunk soft tissue sarcoma (ETSTS) is rare with no standardized management. We sought to determine management patterns for regional lymph node metastasis in ETSTS.

Methods: A survey regarding the management of ETSTS lymph node metastasis was distributed to the membership of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) and the Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) in January 2022. The survey queried the type of training (surgical oncology, orthopedic oncology), details of their practice setting, and management decisions of hypothetical ETSTS scenarios that involved potential or confirmed lymph node metastasis.

Results: The survey was distributed to 349 MSTS members (open rate of 63%, completion rate 21%) and 3026 SSO members (open rate of 55%, completion rate 4.7%) and was completed by 214 respondents, of whom 73 (34.1%) and 141 (65.9%) were orthopedic oncology and surgical oncology fellowship-trained, respectively. The majority of respondents practiced in an academic setting (n = 171, 79.9%) and treat >10 extremity sarcoma cases annually (n = 138, 62.2%). In scenarios with confirmed nodal disease for clear cell and epithelioid sarcoma, surgical oncologists were inclined to perform lymphadenectomy, while orthopedic oncologists were inclined to offer targeted lymph node excision with adjuvant radiation (p < 0.001). There was heterogeneity of responses regarding the management of nodal disease regardless of training background.

Conclusion: Self-reported management of nodal disease in ETSTS was variable among respondent groups with differences and similarities based on training background. These data highlight the variability of practice for nodal disease management and the need for consensus-based guidelines.

Citing Articles

Review on Lymph Node Metastases, Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy, and Lymphadenectomy in Sarcoma.

Chmiel P, Krotewicz M, Szumera-Cieckiewicz A, Bartnik E, Czarnecka A, Rutkowski P Curr Oncol. 2024; 31(1):307-323.

PMID: 38248105 PMC: 10814427. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31010020.

References
1.
Keung E, Chiang Y, Voss R, Cormier J, Torres K, Hunt K . Defining the incidence and clinical significance of lymph node metastasis in soft tissue sarcoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017; 44(1):170-177. PMC: 5747371. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.11.014. View

2.
Coindre J, Terrier P, Bui N, Bonichon F, Collin F, Le Doussal V . Prognostic factors in adult patients with locally controlled soft tissue sarcoma. A study of 546 patients from the French Federation of Cancer Centers Sarcoma Group. J Clin Oncol. 1996; 14(3):869-77. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.3.869. View

3.
Fong Y, Coit D, Woodruff J, Brennan M . Lymph node metastasis from soft tissue sarcoma in adults. Analysis of data from a prospective database of 1772 sarcoma patients. Ann Surg. 1993; 217(1):72-7. PMC: 1242736. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199301000-00012. View

4.
Trovik C, Bauer H, Alvegard T, Anderson H, Blomqvist C, Berlin O . Surgical margins, local recurrence and metastasis in soft tissue sarcomas: 559 surgically-treated patients from the Scandinavian Sarcoma Group Register. Eur J Cancer. 2000; 36(6):710-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(99)00287-7. View

5.
Sawamura C, Matsumoto S, Shimoji T, Ae K, Okawa A . Lymphadenectomy and histologic subtype affect overall survival of soft tissue sarcoma patients with nodal metastases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012; 471(3):926-31. PMC: 3563793. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2568-0. View