» Articles » PMID: 36721854

Recurrent Glioblastoma: Ongoing Clinical Challenges and Future Prospects

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Oncology
Date 2023 Feb 1
PMID 36721854
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Virtually all glioblastomas treated in the first-line setting will recur in a short period of time, and the search for alternative effective treatments has so far been unsuccessful. Various obstacles remain unresolved, and no effective salvage therapy for recurrent glioblastoma can be envisaged in the short term. One of the main impediments to progress is the low incidence of the disease itself in comparison with other pathologies, which will be made even lower by the recent WHO classification of gliomas, which includes molecular alterations. This new classification helps refine patient prognosis but does not clarify the most appropriate treatment. Other impediments are related to clinical trials: glioblastoma patients are often excluded from trials due to their advanced age and limiting neurological symptoms; there is also the question of how best to measure treatment efficacy, which conditions the design of trials and can affect the acceptance of results by oncologists and medicine agencies. Other obstacles are related to the drugs themselves: most treatments cannot cross the blood-brain-barrier or the brain-to-tumor barrier to reach therapeutic drug levels in the tumor without producing toxicity; the drugs under study may have adverse metabolic interactions with those required for symptom control; identifying the target of the drug can be a complex issue. Additionally, the optimal method of treatment - local vs systemic therapy, the choice of chemotherapy, irradiation, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, or a combination thereof - is not yet clear in glioblastoma in comparison with other cancers. Finally, in addition to curing or stabilizing the disease, glioblastoma therapy should aim at maintaining the neurological status of the patients to enable them to return to their previous lifestyle. Here we review currently available treatments, obstacles in the search for new treatments, and novel lines of research that show promise for the future.

Citing Articles

Biomimetic Nanoparticle Based Targeted mRNA Vaccine Delivery as a Novel Therapy for Glioblastoma Multiforme.

Ahmed T, Alam K AAPS PharmSciTech. 2025; 26(3):68.

PMID: 39984771 DOI: 10.1208/s12249-025-03065-z.


Multikinase Treatment of Glioblastoma: Evaluating the Rationale for Regorafenib.

Munoz-Marmol A, Melendez B, Hernandez A, Sanz C, Domenech M, Arpi-Llucia O Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(3).

PMID: 39941744 PMC: 11816343. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17030375.


Assessing CD36 and CD47 expression levels in solid tumor indications to stratify patients for VT1021 treatment.

Wang S, Zota V, Vincent M, Clossey D, Chen J, Cieslewicz M NPJ Precis Oncol. 2024; 8(1):278.

PMID: 39627379 PMC: 11614903. DOI: 10.1038/s41698-024-00774-9.


Design of Experiments to Tailor the Potential of BSA-Coated Peptide Nanocomplexes for Temozolomide/p53 Gene Co-Delivery.

Afonso I, Neves A, Eusebio D, Albuquerque T, Vives E, Boisguerin P Pharmaceutics. 2024; 16(11).

PMID: 39598513 PMC: 11597296. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16111389.


Epigenetic Characteristics in Primary and Recurrent Glioblastoma-Influence on the Clinical Course.

Quiring A, Spielmann H, Teping F, Saffour S, Khafaji F, Schulz-Schaeffer W Biomedicines. 2024; 12(9).

PMID: 39335591 PMC: 11429499. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12092078.


References
1.
Ellingson B, Chung C, Pope W, Boxerman J, Kaufmann T . Pseudoprogression, radionecrosis, inflammation or true tumor progression? challenges associated with glioblastoma response assessment in an evolving therapeutic landscape. J Neurooncol. 2017; 134(3):495-504. PMC: 7893814. DOI: 10.1007/s11060-017-2375-2. View

2.
Minaya P, Baumstarck K, Berbis J, Goncalves A, Barlesi F, Michel G . The CareGiver Oncology Quality of Life questionnaire (CarGOQoL): development and validation of an instrument to measure the quality of life of the caregivers of patients with cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2011; 48(6):904-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.09.010. View

3.
Montemurro N, Perrini P, Olivares Blanco M, Vannozzi R . Second surgery for recurrent glioblastoma: A concise overview of the current literature. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016; 142:60-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.01.010. View

4.
Khan I, Baig M, Mahfooz S, Imran M, Khan M, Dong J . Nanomedicine for glioblastoma: Progress and future prospects. Semin Cancer Biol. 2022; 86(Pt 2):172-186. DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2022.06.007. View

5.
Friedman H, Prados M, Wen P, Mikkelsen T, Schiff D, Abrey L . Bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27(28):4733-40. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.8721. View