» Articles » PMID: 36717845

In Vitro Co-culture Systems of Hepatic and Intestinal Cells for Cellular Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Studies of Capecitabine Against Colorectal Cancer

Overview
Journal Cancer Cell Int
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2023 Jan 31
PMID 36717845
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: As a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), orally administrated capecitabine (CAP) undergoes preliminary conversion into active metabolites in the liver and then releases 5-FU in the gut to exert the anti-tumor activity. Since metabolic changes of CAP play a key role in its activation, a single kind of intestinal or hepatic cell can never be used in vitro to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) nature. Hence, we aimed to establish a novel in vitro system to effectively assess the PK and PD of these kinds of prodrugs.

Methods: Co-culture cellular models were established by simultaneously using colorectal cancer (CRC) and hepatocarcinoma cell lines in one system. Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) and flow cytometric analysis were used to evaluate cell viability and apoptosis, respectively. Apoptosis-related protein expression levels were measured using western blot analysis. A selective liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was developed for cellular PK in co-culture models.

Results: CAP had little anti-proliferative effect on the five monolayer CRC cell lines (SW480, LoVo, HCT-8, HCT-116 and SW620) or the hepatocarcinoma cell line (HepG2). However, CAP exerted marked anti-tumor activities on each of the CRC cell lines in the co-culture models containing both CRC and hepatocarcinoma cell lines, although its effect on the five CRC cell lines varied. Moreover, after pre-incubation of CAP with HepG2 cells, the culture media containing the active metabolites of CAP also showed an anti-tumor effect on the five CRC cell lines, indicating the crucial role of hepatic cells in the activation of CAP.

Conclusion: The simple and cost‑effective co-culture models with both CRC and hepatocarcinoma cells could mimic the in vivo process of a prodrug dependent on metabolic conversion to active metabolites in the liver, providing a valuable strategy for evaluating the PK and PD characteristics of CAP-like prodrugs in vitro at the early stage of drug development.

Citing Articles

Global research trends on biomarkers for cancer immunotherapy: Visualization and bibliometric analysis.

Qiao Y, Xie D, Li Z, Cao S, Zhao D Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2025; 21(1):2435598.

PMID: 39773010 PMC: 11730411. DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2435598.


Examination of the effects of capecitabine treatment on the HT-29 colorectal cancer cell line and HCG 11, HCG 15, and HCG 18 lncRNAs in CRC patients before and after chemotherapy.

Alkharsan A, Safaralizadeh R, Khalaj-Kondori M, Hosseinpourfeizi M Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2024; .

PMID: 39702604 DOI: 10.1007/s00210-024-03674-8.


Anti-Colon Cancer Effects of Lysate from Potential Probiotic Yeast Strains Derived from Human Breast Milk.

Wu Y, Li C, Geng Z, Wang L, Wang S, Zhang D Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2024; .

PMID: 39627436 DOI: 10.1007/s12602-024-10410-4.


Advanced prodrug strategies in nucleoside analogues targeting the treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies.

Xu X, Li Z, Yao X, Sun N, Chang J Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023; 11:1173432.

PMID: 37143892 PMC: 10151537. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1173432.

References
1.
Milano G, McLeod H . Can dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase impact 5-fluorouracil-based treatment?. Eur J Cancer. 2000; 36(1):37-42. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(99)00211-7. View

2.
Rakitina T, Vasilevskaya I, ODwyer P . Additive interaction of oxaliplatin and 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin in colon cancer cell lines results from inhibition of nuclear factor kappaB signaling. Cancer Res. 2003; 63(24):8600-5. View

3.
Guzzardi M, Vozzi F, Ahluwalia A . Study of the crosstalk between hepatocytes and endothelial cells using a novel multicompartmental bioreactor: a comparison between connected cultures and cocultures. Tissue Eng Part A. 2009; 15(11):3635-44. DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2008.0695. View

4.
Bonotto M, Bozza C, Di Loreto C, Osa E, Poletto E, Puglisi F . Making capecitabine targeted therapy for breast cancer: which is the role of thymidine phosphorylase?. Clin Breast Cancer. 2012; 13(3):167-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2012.10.002. View

5.
Lou Y, Wang Q, Zheng J, Hu H, Liu L, Hong D . Possible Pathways of Capecitabine-Induced Hand-Foot Syndrome. Chem Res Toxicol. 2016; 29(10):1591-1601. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.6b00215. View