Trends in Human Species-Specific Lifespan and Actuarial Aging Rate

Overview

Journal Biochemistry (Mosc)

Specialty Biochemistry

Date 2023 Jan 30

PMID 36717451

Authors

Leonid A Gavrilov

Natalia S Gavrilova

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The compensation effect of mortality (CEM) was tested and species-specific lifespan was estimated using data on one-year age-specific death rates from the Human Mortality Database (HMD). CEM was confirmed using this source of the data and human species-specific lifespan estimates were obtained, which were similar to the estimates published before. Three models (Gompertz-Makeham, Gompertz-Makeham with mean-centered age, and Gompertz) produced similar estimates of the species-specific lifespan. These estimates demonstrated some increase over time. Attempts to measure aging rates through the Gompertz slope parameter led to the conclusion that actuarial aging rates were stable during most of the 20th century, but recently demonstrated an increase over time in the majority (74%) of studied populations. This recent phenomenon is most likely caused by more rapid historical decline of mortality at the younger adult age groups compared to the older age groups, thus making the age gradient in mortality steeper over time. There is no biomedical reason to believe that human aging rates accelerated recently, so that the actuarial aging rate is probably not a good measure of true aging rate (rate of functional loss). Therefore, better measures of aging rate need to be developed.

Citing Articles

Compensation effect of mortality is a challenge to substantial lifespan extension of humans.

Gavrilova N, Gavrilov L Biogerontology. 2024; 25(5):851-857.

PMID: 38811415 PMC: 11779503. DOI: 10.1007/s10522-024-10111-z.

Exploring Patterns of Human Mortality and Aging: A Reliability Theory Viewpoint.

Gavrilov L, Gavrilova N Biochemistry (Mosc). 2024; 89(2):341-355.

PMID: 38622100 PMC: 11090256. DOI: 10.1134/S0006297924020123.

Actuarial Aging Rates in Human Cohorts.

Gavrilov L, Gavrilova N Biochemistry (Mosc). 2023; 88(11):1778-1785.

PMID: 38105198 PMC: 11087818. DOI: 10.1134/S0006297923110093.

References

Tuljapurkar S, Li N, Boe C . A universal pattern of mortality decline in the G7 countries. Nature. 2000; 405(6788):789-92. DOI: 10.1038/35015561. View

Robine J, Cubaynes S . Worldwide demography of centenarians. Mech Ageing Dev. 2017; 165(Pt B):59-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.mad.2017.03.004. View

Yashin A, Begun A, Boiko S, Ukraintseva S, Oeppen J . New age patterns of survival improvement in Sweden: do they characterize changes in individual aging?. Mech Ageing Dev. 2002; 123(6):637-47. DOI: 10.1016/s0047-6374(01)00410-9. View

Strehler B, Mildvan A . General theory of mortality and aging. Science. 1960; 132(3418):14-21. DOI: 10.1126/science.132.3418.14. View

Tarkhov A, Menshikov L, Fedichev P . Strehler-Mildvan correlation is a degenerate manifold of Gompertz fit. J Theor Biol. 2017; 416:180-189. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.01.017. View

Gavrilov L, Gavrilova N, Nosov V . Human life span stopped increasing: why?. Gerontology. 1983; 29(3):176-80. DOI: 10.1159/000213111. View

Burger O, Missov T . Evolutionary theory of ageing and the problem of correlated Gompertz parameters. J Theor Biol. 2016; 408:34-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2016.08.002. View

Golubev A . Does Makeham make sense?. Biogerontology. 2004; 5(3):159-67. DOI: 10.1023/B:BGEN.0000031153.63563.58. View

Skulachev V, Shilovsky G, Putyatina T, Popov N, Markov A, Skulachev M . Perspectives of lifespan extension: focus on external or internal resources?. Aging (Albany NY). 2020; 12(6):5566-5584. PMC: 7138562. DOI: 10.18632/aging.102981. View

10.

Yashin A, Ukraintseva S, Boiko S, Arbeev K . Individual aging and mortality rate: how are they related?. Soc Biol. 2003; 49(3-4):206-17. DOI: 10.1080/19485565.2002.9989059. View

11.

Li T, Yang Y, Anderson J . Mortality increase in late-middle and early-old age: heterogeneity in death processes as a new explanation. Demography. 2013; 50(5):1563-91. PMC: 4028711. DOI: 10.1007/s13524-013-0222-4. View

12.

Hawkes K, Smith K, Blevins J . Human actuarial aging increases faster when background death rates are lower: a consequence of differential heterogeneity?. Evolution. 2012; 66(1):103-14. PMC: 4010320. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01414.x. View

13.

Drefahl S, Lundstrom H, Modig K, Ahlbom A . The era of centenarians: mortality of the oldest old in Sweden. J Intern Med. 2012; 272(1):100-2. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2012.02518.x. View

14.

Gavrilov L, Krutko V, Gavrilova N . The Future of Human Longevity. Gerontology. 2017; 63(6):524-526. PMC: 5654601. DOI: 10.1159/000477965. View

15.

Bongaarts J . Trends in senescent life expectancy. Popul Stud (Camb). 2009; 63(3):203-13. PMC: 2772142. DOI: 10.1080/00324720903165456. View

16.

Li T, Anderson J . The Strehler-Mildvan correlation from the perspective of a two-process vitality model. Popul Stud (Camb). 2015; 69(1):91-104. PMC: 4850073. DOI: 10.1080/00324728.2014.992358. View

17.

Bongaarts J . Long-range trends in adult mortality: models and projection methods. Demography. 2005; 42(1):23-49. DOI: 10.1353/dem.2005.0003. View

18.

Gavrilov L . [Does a limit of the life span really exist?]. Biofizika. 1984; 29(5):908-11. View

19.

Yashin A, Begun A, Boiko S, Ukraintseva S, Oeppen J . The new trends in survival improvement require a revision of traditional gerontological concepts. Exp Gerontol. 2001; 37(1):157-67. DOI: 10.1016/s0531-5565(01)00154-1. View

20.

Gavrilov L, Gavrilova N, Iaguzhinskii L . [Basic patterns of aging and death in animals from the standpoint of reliability theory]. Zh Obshch Biol. 1978; 39(5):734-42. View