» Articles » PMID: 36717091

Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Selective Biportal Endoscopic Posterior Decompression for Multilevel Lumbar Degenerative Diseases

Overview
Journal Asian Spine J
Date 2023 Jan 30
PMID 36717091
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Oblique lumbar interbody fusion is a minimally invasive procedure for treating degenerative lumbar disease. Its advantages include correcting coronal and sagittal spinal alignment and indirect neural decompression. However, achieving a successful outcome is limited in some patients who need direct decompression for central canal lesions including hard stenotic lesions (endplate or facet articular osteophytes and ossification of posterior longitudinal ligaments) and sequestration of the disk. Biportal endoscopic spinal surgery is a minimally invasive technique, which directly decompresses the lesion. By taking advantage of two procedures, in a longlevel lumbar lesion, alignment correction and direct decompression can be both achieved. Herein, the authors introduce multilevel lumbar fusion through oblique lumbar interbody fusion and selective direct decompression through biportal endoscopic spinal surgery and discuss the surgical indications, surgical pitfalls, and recommendations for application. Consequently, it is regarded as a minimally invasive interbody fusion method for patients with multilevel lumbar degenerative degeneration.

Citing Articles

Comparison of clinical and radiologic outcomes between biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

You K, Hyun J, Park S, Kang M, Cho S, Park H Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):29652.

PMID: 39609526 PMC: 11604668. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-81402-1.


Expandable Cages for Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Narrative Review.

Lee S, Yoon J, Park S, Chae D J Clin Med. 2024; 13(10).

PMID: 38792431 PMC: 11122612. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13102889.


Osteobiologies for Spinal Fusion from Biological Mechanisms to Clinical Applications: A Narrative Review.

Keum B, Kim H, Kim G, Chang D Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(24).

PMID: 38139194 PMC: 10743675. DOI: 10.3390/ijms242417365.

References
1.
Li J, Phan K, Mobbs R . Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technical Aspects, Operative Outcomes, and Complications. World Neurosurg. 2016; 98:113-123. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.10.074. View

2.
Kang T, Park S, Kang C, Lee S, Park J, Suh S . Is biportal technique/endoscopic spinal surgery satisfactory for lumbar spinal stenosis patients?: A prospective randomized comparative study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019; 98(18):e15451. PMC: 6504265. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015451. View

3.
Lee W, Park J, Kim K, Kuh S, Chin D, Kim K . Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Multilevel: Comparison with Conventional Transforaminal Interbody Fusion. World Neurosurg. 2015; 85:236-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.09.009. View

4.
Ohtori S, Mannoji C, Orita S, Yamauchi K, Eguchi Y, Ochiai N . Mini-Open Anterior Retroperitoneal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion for Degenerated Lumbar Spinal Kyphoscoliosis. Asian Spine J. 2015; 9(4):565-72. PMC: 4522447. DOI: 10.4184/asj.2015.9.4.565. View

5.
Saraph V, Lerch C, Walochnik N, Bach C, Krismer M, Wimmer C . Comparison of conventional versus minimally invasive extraperitoneal approach for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J. 2004; 13(5):425-31. PMC: 3476582. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-004-0722-4. View