» Articles » PMID: 36713673

Double Pigtail Tube Drainage for Large Multiloculated Pyogenic Liver Abscesses

Overview
Journal Front Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2023 Jan 30
PMID 36713673
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of double pigtail tube drainage compared with single pigtail tube drainage for the treatment of multiloculated pyogenic liver abscesses greater than 5 cm.

Patients And Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed patients with pyogenic liver abscess admitted in the Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical College between May 2013 and May 2021. Patients with pyogenic liver abscess more than 5 cm in size, who underwent drainage of the abscess with either double pigtail or single pigtail tube, were included.

Results: A total of 97 patients with pyogenic liver abscesses larger than 5 cm were studied. These included 34 patients with double pigtail tube drainage and 63 patients with single pigtail tube drainage. The postoperative hospital stay (13.39 ± 4.21 days vs. 15.67 ± 7.50 days;  = 0.045), and time for removal of the catheter (17.23 ± 3.70 days vs. 24.11 ± 5.83 days;  = 0.038) were lower in the double pigtail tube group compared with the single pigtail tube group. The rate of reduction, in three days, of c-reactive protein levels was 26.61 ± 14.11 mg/L/day in the double pigtail tube group vs. 20.06 ± 11.74 mg/L/day in the single pigtail tube group ( = 0.025). The diameter of the abscess cavity at discharge was 3.1 ± 0.07 cm in the double pigtail tube group as compared with 3.7 ± 0.6 cm in the single pigtail tube group ( = 0.047). There was no bleeding in any of the patients despite abnormal coagulation profiles. There was no recurrence of abscess within six months of discharge and no death in the double pigtail tube group. Conclusion: Double pigtail tube drainage treatment in multiloculated pyogenic liver abscesses greater than 5 cm in size, is safe and effective.

Citing Articles

Etiology, Risk Factors, and Antimicrobial Resistance in Recurrent Pyogenic Liver Abscesses: A Six-Year Analysis.

Cui J, Liu Y, Fu H, Cui M, Li J, Bai Z Infect Drug Resist. 2025; 18():15-23.

PMID: 39776754 PMC: 11705988. DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S492544.


Development of a nomogram to assess thromboembolic risk in patients with liver abscesses.

Lee J, Nam S, Kwon J, Shim D, Baek S, Lee S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):26718.

PMID: 39496713 PMC: 11535388. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-77799-4.


The New Changes of Epidemiology, Etiology, and Clinical Characteristics of Pyogenic Liver Abscesses: A Retrospective Study in a Hospital in Northern China.

Cui J, Liu Y, Li J Infect Drug Resist. 2023; 16:4013-4023.

PMID: 37377730 PMC: 10292621. DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S416860.

References
1.
Chan K, Thng C, Chan Y, Shelat V . Outcomes of Gas-Forming Pyogenic Liver Abscess Are Comparable to Non-Gas-Forming Pyogenic Liver Abscess in the Era of Multi-Modal Care: A Propensity Score Matched Study. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2020; 21(10):884-890. DOI: 10.1089/sur.2019.278. View

2.
Wang H, Ren Y, Chang Z, Liu Z . Bleeding risk of image-guided percutaneous catheter drainage of pyogenic liver abscess in patients with coagulopathy. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021; 46(9):4460-4466. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03075-y. View

3.
Mangukiya D, Darshan J, Kanani V, Gupta S . A prospective series case study of pyogenic liver abscess: recent trands in etiology and management. Indian J Surg. 2013; 74(5):385-90. PMC: 3477416. DOI: 10.1007/s12262-011-0397-0. View

4.
Sohn S, Kim K, Park J, Kim T . Predictors of Mortality in Korean Patients with Pyogenic Liver Abscess: A Single Center, Retrospective Study. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2016; 67(5):238-44. DOI: 10.4166/kjg.2016.67.5.238. View

5.
Shin-Jung Lee S, Chen Y, Tsai H, Wann S, Lin H, Huang C . Predictors of septic metastatic infection and mortality among patients with Klebsiella pneumoniae liver abscess. Clin Infect Dis. 2008; 47(5):642-50. DOI: 10.1086/590932. View