» Articles » PMID: 36712268

Predicting In-hospital All-cause Mortality in Heart Failure Using Machine Learning

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The age of onset and causes of heart failure differ between high-income and low-and-middle-income countries (LMIC). Heart failure patients in LMIC also experience a higher mortality rate. Innovative ways that can risk stratify heart failure patients in this region are needed. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the utility of machine learning in predicting all-cause mortality in heart failure patients hospitalised in a tertiary academic centre.

Methods: Six supervised machine learning algorithms were trained to predict in-hospital all-cause mortality using data from 500 consecutive heart failure patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 50%.

Results: The mean age was 55.2 ± 16.8 years. There were 271 (54.2%) males, and the mean LVEF was 29 ± 9.2%. The median duration of hospitalisation was 7 days (interquartile range: 4-11), and it did not differ between patients discharged alive and those who died. After a prediction window of 4 years (interquartile range: 2-6), 84 (16.8%) patients died before discharge from the hospital. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.82, 0.78, 0.77, 0.76, 0.75, and 0.62 for random forest, logistic regression, support vector machines (SVM), extreme gradient boosting, multilayer perceptron (MLP), and decision trees, and the accuracy during the test phase was 88, 87, 86, 82, 78, and 76% for random forest, MLP, SVM, extreme gradient boosting, decision trees, and logistic regression. The support vector machines were the best performing algorithm, and furosemide, beta-blockers, spironolactone, early diastolic murmur, and a parasternal heave had a positive coefficient with the target feature, whereas coronary artery disease, potassium, oedema grade, ischaemic cardiomyopathy, and right bundle branch block on electrocardiogram had negative coefficients.

Conclusion: Despite a small sample size, supervised machine learning algorithms successfully predicted all-cause mortality with modest accuracy. The SVM model will be externally validated using data from multiple cardiology centres in South Africa before developing a uniquely African risk prediction tool that can potentially transform heart failure management through precision medicine.

Citing Articles

An explainable multi-objective hybrid machine learning model for reducing heart failure mortality.

Shamrat F, Khalid M, Qadah T, Farrash M, Alshanbari H PeerJ Comput Sci. 2025; 11:e2682.

PMID: 40062267 PMC: 11888912. DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2682.


Integrating EPSOSA-BP neural network algorithm for enhanced accuracy and robustness in optimizing coronary artery disease prediction.

Li C, Wang Y, Meng L, Zhong W, Zhang C, Liu T Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):30993.

PMID: 39730803 PMC: 11680579. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-82184-2.


Predictive Value of Machine Learning for the Risk of In-Hospital Death in Patients With Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Yan L, Zhang J, Chen L, Zhu Z, Sheng X, Zheng G Clin Cardiol. 2024; 48(1):e70071.

PMID: 39723651 PMC: 11670054. DOI: 10.1002/clc.70071.


Machine learning models for predicting risks of MACEs for myocardial infarction patients with different VEGFR2 genotypes.

Kirdeev A, Burkin K, Vorobev A, Zbirovskaya E, Lifshits G, Nikolaev K Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1452239.

PMID: 39301488 PMC: 11410707. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1452239.


Machine learning in heart failure diagnosis, prediction, and prognosis: review.

Saqib M, Perswani P, Muneem A, Mumtaz H, Neha F, Ali S Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024; 86(6):3615-3623.

PMID: 38846887 PMC: 11152866. DOI: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002138.


References
1.
Chicco D, Jurman G . Machine learning can predict survival of patients with heart failure from serum creatinine and ejection fraction alone. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020; 20(1):16. PMC: 6998201. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-020-1023-5. View

2.
Adler E, Voors A, Klein L, Macheret F, Braun O, Urey M . Improving risk prediction in heart failure using machine learning. Eur J Heart Fail. 2019; 22(1):139-147. DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.1628. View

3.
Callender T, Woodward M, Roth G, Farzadfar F, Lemarie J, Gicquel S . Heart failure care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2014; 11(8):e1001699. PMC: 4130667. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001699. View

4.
Balki I, Amirabadi A, Levman J, Martel A, Emersic Z, Meden B . Sample-Size Determination Methodologies for Machine Learning in Medical Imaging Research: A Systematic Review. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2019; 70(4):344-353. DOI: 10.1016/j.carj.2019.06.002. View

5.
Al-Omary M, Davies A, Evans T, Bastian B, Fletcher P, Attia J . Mortality and Readmission Following Hospitalisation for Heart Failure in Australia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Heart Lung Circ. 2018; 27(8):917-927. DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2018.01.009. View