» Articles » PMID: 36711409

Short-term Efficacy of Non-pharmacological Interventions for Global Population with Elevated Blood Pressure: A Network Meta-analysis

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2023 Jan 30
PMID 36711409
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This study aims to compare the potential short-term effects of non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs) on prehypertensive people, and provide evidence for intervention models with potential in future community-based management.

Methods: In this Bayesian network meta-analysis, Pubmed, Embase, and Web of science were screened up to 16 October 2021. Prehypertensive patients (systolic blood pressure, SBP 120-139 mmHg/diastolic blood pressure, DBP 80-89 mmHg) with a follow-up period longer than 4 weeks were targeted. Sixteen NPIs were identified during the scope review and categorized into five groups. Reduction in SBP and DBP was selected as outcome variables and the effect sizes were compared using consistency models among interventions and intervention groups. Grade approach was used to assess the certainty of evidence.

Results: Thirty-nine studies with 8,279 participants were included. For SBP, strengthen exercises were the most advantageous intervention group when compared with usual care (mean difference = -6.02 mmHg, 95% CI -8.16 to -3.87), and combination exercise, isometric exercise, and aerobic exercise were the three most effective specific interventions. For DBP, relaxation was the most advantageous intervention group when compared with usual care (mean difference = -4.99 mmHg, 95% CI -7.03 to -2.96), and acupuncture, meditation, and combination exercise were the three most effective specific interventions. No inconsistency was found between indirect and direct evidence. However, heterogeneity was detected in some studies.

Conclusion: NPIs can bring short-term BP reduction benefits for prehypertensive patients, especially exercise and relaxation. NPIs could potentially be included in community-based disease management for prehypertensive population once long-term real-world effectiveness and cost-effectiveness are proven.

Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=151518, identifier: CRD42020151518.

Citing Articles

An updated network meta-analysis of non-pharmacological interventions for primary hypertension in adults: insights from recent studies.

Chen Z, Li Q, Xu T, Zhou X, Shu Y, Guo T Syst Rev. 2024; 13(1):318.

PMID: 39736688 PMC: 11686877. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-024-02744-5.


Effect of Tai Chi vs Aerobic Exercise on Blood Pressure in Patients With Prehypertension: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Li X, Chang P, Wu M, Jiang Y, Gao Y, Chen H JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(2):e2354937.

PMID: 38335001 PMC: 10858403. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.54937.


Non-pharmacological interventions for the reduction and maintenance of blood pressure in people with prehypertension: a systematic review protocol.

Bray E, Georgiou R, Hives L, Iqbal N, Benedetto V, Spencer J BMJ Open. 2024; 14(1):e078189.

PMID: 38253457 PMC: 10806604. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078189.


The 2023 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for a health-centred response in a world facing irreversible harms.

Romanello M, Di Napoli C, Green C, Kennard H, Lampard P, Scamman D Lancet. 2023; 402(10419):2346-2394.

PMID: 37977174 PMC: 7616810. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01859-7.


Cost-effectiveness and potential budget impact of non-pharmacological interventions for early management in prehypertensive people: an economic evaluation for China.

Liang L, Shao T, Li H, Zhao M, Tang W BMC Public Health. 2023; 23(1):1531.

PMID: 37568086 PMC: 10416408. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-16458-1.


References
1.
Thiyagarajan R, Pal P, Pal G, Subramanian S, Trakroo M, Bobby Z . Additional benefit of yoga to standard lifestyle modification on blood pressure in prehypertensive subjects: a randomized controlled study. Hypertens Res. 2014; 38(1):48-55. DOI: 10.1038/hr.2014.126. View

2.
Brignardello-Petersen R, Mustafa R, Siemieniuk R, Murad M, Agoritsas T, Izcovich A . GRADE approach to rate the certainty from a network meta-analysis: addressing incoherence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018; 108:77-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.11.025. View

3.
Puska P, Iacono J, Nissinen A, Korhonen H, Vartianinen E, Pietinen P . Controlled, randomised trial of the effect of dietary fat on blood pressure. Lancet. 1983; 1(8314-5):1-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)91556-8. View

4.
Dias S, Welton N, Caldwell D, Ades A . Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2010; 29(7-8):932-44. DOI: 10.1002/sim.3767. View

5.
Rakic V, Puddey I, Burke V, Dimmitt S, Beilin L . Influence of pattern of alcohol intake on blood pressure in regular drinkers: a controlled trial. J Hypertens. 1998; 16(2):165-74. DOI: 10.1097/00004872-199816020-00006. View